Search for: "State of California v. EPA"
Results 1 - 20
of 604
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Apr 2018, 10:27 am
District Court for the Northern District of California decided the case of Californians for Renewable Energy, et al., v. [read post]
24 Jun 2015, 1:00 pm
EPA, decided June 23, 2015, the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied a petition for review filed after EPA acknowledged that it had mistakenly approved certain New Source Review (NSR) rules affecting ozone emissions in California's Central Valley (which includes the San Joaquin Valley) subject to California's State Implementation Plan (SIP), and then corrected this error. [read post]
21 May 2015, 9:04 am
EPA erred in approving California's State Implementation Plans. [read post]
9 Nov 2007, 6:33 am
State of California v. [read post]
30 Jun 2022, 10:31 am
Download as PDF The post Some quick reactions to W Va v. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 2:34 pm
Supreme Court Narrows Scope of EPA Authority Under the Clean Water Act in Sackett v. [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 3:40 pm
Since the Bill changed the state plan, the District sought the EPA's approval. [read post]
16 Jan 2013, 1:19 pm
In this case, ARTBA is also challenging EPA's approval of California's State Implementation Plan, but that challenge must be brought in the Ninth Circuit. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 5:55 am
Sackett v. [read post]
2 Jan 2008, 11:00 am
Late last month, the EPA refused to grant the waiver, which made California really angry. [read post]
18 Sep 2007, 12:02 am
Efforts to address greenhouse gas emissions through nuisance lawsuits suffered a blow last night when the Northern District of California granted defendants' motion to dismiss in California v. [read post]
25 May 2020, 1:14 pm
The liberal Attorneys General of nine States (New York, California, Illinois, Maryland, Michigan, Minnesota, Oregon, Vermont and Virginia) have filed a lawsuit in the federal court for the Southern District of New York (New York, et al. v. [read post]
24 Jun 2015, 9:05 am
§ 52.245 under § 110(k)(6) of the Clean Air Act, an error-correcting provision, after the EPA determined that it had mistakenly approved certain New Source Review rules in 2004 as part of California's State Implementation Plan.Waste Information & Management Services, Inc. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 4:58 pm
The American Lung Association, the National Parks Conservation Association, and 11 states, including New York and California, had asked the court to compel EPA to review the standards and to propose any revisions based upon the latest scientific data. [read post]
26 Aug 2013, 8:53 am
In Lavine v. [read post]
12 Jul 2007, 9:58 am
EPA helps to create a more fertile environment for state action on climate change. [read post]
19 Jul 2019, 7:10 pm
Backstrom, James V. [read post]
24 May 2022, 6:29 am
State like California would want to double down on those suits. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 9:01 am
<> California Dump Truck Owners Association V. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 11:57 am
On August 8, 2019, New York, California, Hawaii, Maryland, Vermont, Washington, Massachusetts, and the District of Columbia (States) also filed a new petition for judicial review concerning the refusal of EPA to ban chlorpyrifos. [read post]
