Search for: "State of California v. EPA (AMENDED)"
Results 1 - 20
of 230
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jun 2015, 1:00 pm
EPA, decided June 23, 2015, the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied a petition for review filed after EPA acknowledged that it had mistakenly approved certain New Source Review (NSR) rules affecting ozone emissions in California's Central Valley (which includes the San Joaquin Valley) subject to California's State Implementation Plan (SIP), and then corrected this error. [read post]
26 Aug 2013, 8:53 am
In Lavine v. [read post]
16 Jan 2013, 1:19 pm
In this case, ARTBA is also challenging EPA's approval of California's State Implementation Plan, but that challenge must be brought in the Ninth Circuit. [read post]
15 Aug 2019, 11:03 am
Burchi, and James V. [read post]
20 Jul 2022, 4:33 pm
” Monsanto additionally provided evidence regarding the August 2019 letter from EPA to glyphosate registrants that it would not permit label amendments to include warnings under California’s Proposition 65 that glyphosate is known to the State of California to cause cancer. [read post]
14 Jul 2022, 4:42 pm
By James V. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 5:00 pm
Large population states such as California are seriously underrepresented in Congress. [read post]
20 Aug 2014, 11:31 am
As previously reported, the United States District Court for the Northern District of California granted EPA’s motions to dismiss for failure to state an affirmative “agency action” that would trigger section 7. [read post]
26 May 2023, 10:54 am
Supreme Court decision Sackett v EPA overturns a decision from the U.S. [read post]
11 Dec 2013, 3:40 pm
The United States District Court for the Northern District of California agreed, and held that the amended complaint was too ambiguous as to which affirmative agency actions required EPA to consult about trifluralin before registering it. [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 5:54 pm
By James V. [read post]
1 May 2013, 10:53 am
Environmental Protection Agency, the United States District Court for the Northern District of California dismissed with leave to amend (pdf) a suit alleging that the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) violated section 7 of the Endangered Species Act (ESA) by failing to consult with the United States Fish and Wildlife Service or the National Marine Fisheries Service on the effects of 382 registered pesticides on endangered and threatened species. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 4:15 pm
District Court for the Eastern District of California granted summary judgment for the Plaintiffs in National Association of Wheat Growers et. al. v. [read post]
18 Jun 2011, 6:27 am
California v. [read post]
31 May 2018, 9:01 pm
As I explain in more detail below as I parse the complaint in the United States v. [read post]
6 Jun 2018, 8:23 am
The second complaint was filed by the States of New York, California, and Maryland, New York v. [read post]
Eastern District of California Rules on Motion to Enjoin Prop 65 Listing and Warning on Glyphosate P
28 Feb 2018, 2:29 pm
Burchi, and James V. [read post]
15 Dec 2023, 1:13 pm
OCT is the group behind the Juliana litigation, in addition to several cases brought against states in state courts. [read post]
12 Apr 2024, 7:59 am
Circuit’s long-awaited decision is State of Ohio v. [read post]
20 Jul 2020, 11:31 am
The federal Equal Pay Act (EPA) and its many state analogs require equal pay for equal (or, in some states, “substantially similar”) work. [read post]
