Search for: "State of Delaware v. Christmas." Results 1 - 20 of 33
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Oct 2009, 9:35 am
More specifically, the patent discloses and claims a variety of embodiments of a method and associated apparatus for programmatically substituting synonyms into text [...]...US Supreme Court Grants Cert. in BilskiOn Monday, June 1, 2009, the United States Supreme Court granted cert. in Bilski v. [read post]
17 Jan 2011, 1:59 am
In the quiet between Christmas and New Years, the FDA released an environmental assessment conducted in response to a multi-state foodborne disease outbreak involving 33 cases of E. coli O145 infections in five states in the spring of 2010. [read post]
20 Dec 2021, 5:30 am by INFORRM
The Michaelmas Legal Term ends tomorrow and this is the final Round Up before the Christmas break. [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 5:04 am
Worse than that, the Delaware Supreme Court more or less rejected medical monitoring as a separate cause of action in Mergenthaler v. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 12:15 pm by Law Lady
Abuse & Neglect: NEGLECT FINDING REQUIRES PROOF OF MENTAL STATE, DELAWARE SUPREME COURT FINDS, Dep't of Health & Social Servs. v. [read post]
12 Feb 2022, 3:36 pm by Kim Krawiec
The paper itself describes several business law cases from different jurisdictions, including Shawe v. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 11:56 am by Florian Mueller
There may be preliminary or even seemingly-final rulings during that period, but in practical terms, Apple is almost certainly safe from any actual, material impact on its iPhone 5 sales for the important Christmas selling season. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 1:23 pm by Kevin LaCroix
The court doesn’t insist that the board members should have stated they were not independent. [read post]
22 Dec 2011, 11:59 am by Bexis
  All this in a state – Illinois – where the highest court forbids FDCA-based common-law causes of action (see Martin v. [read post]
22 Nov 2008, 2:52 pm
Nov. 18, 2008)(Unpublished)Affirming dismissal of termination claim under state lawDC CircuitMontgomery v. [read post]