Search for: "State of Georgia v. EPA"
Results 41 - 60
of 148
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Apr 2007, 8:12 am
Relying primarily on a 1907 ruling (Georgia v. [read post]
19 Apr 2022, 12:37 pm
United States Citizenship & Immigration Services. 407 F.Supp.3d 311 (D.D.C. 2019); Knight First Amendment Institute v. [read post]
14 Jul 2015, 6:22 pm
[1] Ohio in The State of Ohio v. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 9:03 am
EPA & National Mining Association v. [read post]
17 Oct 2008, 6:17 pm
In Massachusetts v. [read post]
2 Jan 2009, 6:04 pm
The administrator's interpretation of the CAA is directly contrary to a Georgia state court ruling last June that CO2 is a pollutant subject to regulation under the CAA. [read post]
2 Apr 2007, 11:45 am
EPA "recalls the previous high-water mark of diluted standing requirements, United States v. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 3:35 pm
In particular, the Second Circuit followed a 1907 Supreme Court case called Georgia v. [read post]
1 May 2024, 3:09 pm
See Pate v. [read post]
2 Dec 2012, 11:40 pm
Northwest Environmental Defense Center and Georgia-Pacific West, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Aug 2015, 9:14 am
North Dakota v. [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 2:21 am
Defense Center and Georgia-Pacific West Inc. v. [read post]
6 Apr 2023, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court’s decision in West Virginia v. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 1:22 am
As Chief Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes elegantly said in the 1907 a case called Georgia v. [read post]
15 Dec 2016, 7:41 am
Georgia Gulf Corp. and United States ex rel. [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 4:04 am
” At Ars Technica (via How Appealing), Timothy Lee looks at Georgia v. [read post]
4 Dec 2019, 3:56 am
” Briefly: Ronald Mann analyzes Monday’s argument in Georgia v. [read post]
9 Jul 2008, 9:37 pm
" The Court found that the Supreme Court in Massachusetts v EPA did determine CO2 was a "pollutant subject to regulation. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 9:30 pm
United States and Carabell v. [read post]
