Search for: "State of Georgia v. EPA" Results 61 - 80 of 148
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Oct 2023, 9:05 pm by Noah Brown
The Georgia Supreme Court upheld the state’s six-week abortion ban. [read post]
31 Mar 2008, 8:53 am
EPA: Parens Patriae Standing for State Global Warming Plaintiffs Sara Zdeb [read post]
18 Sep 2018, 10:45 am by Joyce Kung
Decisions in the district courts in Georgia and North Dakota have enjoined the WOTUS rule in the remaining 24 states. [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 1:53 pm by Richard Renner
United States District Court, Middle District of Georgia, Athens Division. [read post]
26 Oct 2015, 3:48 am by Cari Rincker
This ended up leading to a great deal of litigation to determine how expansive the definition of WOTUS was, with the United States Supreme Court in Rapanos v. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 6:37 am by admin
New London, the landmark upholding, was only 5-4 and triggered massive political blowback before ending in farce, and it’s impossible to read recent decisions such as the Court’s 9-0 smackdown of EPA in Sacketts v. [read post]
25 May 2012, 6:39 am by Nabiha Syed
Northwest Environmental Defense Center and Georgia-Pacific West Inc. v. [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 5:28 am by Will Baude
EPA, and does not explicitly argue for any kind of "special solicitude" for state claims of standing. [read post]
10 Jul 2022, 9:05 pm by Series of Essays
Lytton, University of Georgia Law School; Randolph May, Free State Foundation; Richard J. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 5:05 am by Rachel Sachs
Northwest Environmental Defense Center and Georgia-Pacific West v. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 7:41 am by Dan Farber
With turnout possibly boosted by the overruling of Roe v. [read post]
JPS
5 Apr 2007, 2:53 pm
Why on earth did Stevens include the Georgia v Tennessee Copper Co. case in Massachusetts v EPA? [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 1:30 pm by Tom Goldstein
Finally, Judge Garland joined a dissent from the denial of rehearing en banc of a significant panel opinion invalidating EPA regulations under the non-delegation doctrine. [read post]