Search for: "State of Indiana v. Adams" Results 1 - 20 of 242
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Mar 2015, 11:54 am by CrimProf BlogEditor
Adam Lamparello (Indiana Tech - Law School) has posted Riley v. [read post]
21 May 2012, 10:50 am by Marcia Oddi
State of Indiana, a 6-page opinion, Judge Najam writes:Dante Adams appeals... [read post]
2 Feb 2016, 7:20 pm by CrimProf BlogEditor
Adam Lamparello and Cynthia G Swann (Indiana Tech - Law School and Indiana Tech - Law School) have posted Birchfield v. [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 8:43 am by Michael Lowe
Indiana Took His $42,000 Land Rover,” written by Adam Liptak and published by the New York Times on June 25, 2018. [read post]
27 Mar 2008, 8:25 am
In its appeal to the United States Supreme Court, Indiana v. [read post]
24 Sep 2007, 3:15 am
Updating this ILB entry from Saturday, which listed three Indiana-based cases eligible for cert grant at the SCOTUS conference today, including Indiana's voter ID case, Crawford v. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 10:25 am
Interesting case.6-25-2010 Indiana:Although state law allows police to request identification from passengers inside a car that they’ve stopped, two Indianapolis officers shouldn’t have arrested a man for refusing to identify himself when there was no reasonable suspicion he’d done anything wrong.The Indiana Court of Appeals addressed that issue in a six-page opinion today in Adam Starr v. [read post]
14 Dec 2018, 2:00 am by Paul Caron
Adam Thimmesch (Nebraska), Darien Shanske (UC-Davis) & David Gamage (Indiana), Wayfair: Marketplaces and Foreign Vendors, 90 State Tax Notes 111 (Oct. 8, 2018): This is the third of a series of essays wherein we analyze the U.S. [read post]
9 Apr 2007, 10:40 am
Adams of the Louisville Courier Journal has a story this morning (that has since been picked up by other papers) on the oral arguments set to be heard before the Indiana Supreme Court this Thursday in the case of Jesus Arrieta v. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 2:35 pm
"The Supreme Court’s decision not to hear the case was a surprise, as the court last year temporarily blocked the law for the November election, and voters were not required to show photo identifications in order to vote," writes Adam Liptak in the NYT.A three-judge panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, in Chicago, upheld the law, reasoning that it was similar to one from Indiana that the Supreme Court had sustained in 2008 in… [read post]