Search for: "State of Louisiana In The Interest of J. W., III" Results 1 - 20 of 25
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Its only business activity consisted of holding its interest in Davis-Lynch, LLC (“D-L LLC”), a Texas single-member limited liability company authorized to do business in Louisiana and that was disregarded for federal and state income tax purposes. [read post]
L. 2023 HB618 – Still No Taking All the Credit for Taxes Paid to Other States Restrictions on the availability of a credit for net income taxes paid in another state have been extended – (i) the credit is limited to the amount of Louisiana income tax that would have been imposed if the income earned in the other state had been earned in Louisiana, (ii) the credit is not allowed for tax paid on income that is not subject to tax in… [read post]
23 Dec 2019, 12:28 pm by Tom Kosakowski
Kathleen Moore, National Institutes of Health;Belinda Newman, University of North Texas [retired in 2018, but not previously announced];Jackie Osborne, Chevron Corporation;Lee Potts, University of Colorado, Boulder;Lee Twyman; Rochester Institute of Technology; andElaine Wynn, University of Tennessee, Knoxville.Passings -- Colleagues remembered several Ombuds who passed:Toshio Akamine, Washington State University;Thomas W. [read post]
9 Mar 2020, 10:26 am by Robert Liles
CMS can revoke Medicare billing privileges if a provider, supplier or any owner or managing employee was convicted of a Federal or State felony (within the preceding 10 years) that CMS determines is detrimental to the best interests of the Medicare program and its beneficiaries. [read post]
27 Jul 2008, 3:27 pm
J., and SCALIA, KENNEDY, and THOMAS, JJ., joined, and in which STEVENS, GINSBURG, and BREYER, JJ., joined, as to Parts I, II, and III. [read post]
9 Mar 2020, 10:26 am by Robert Liles
  Under 42 CFR Sec. 424.535(a) (3), CMS can revoke Medicare billing privileges if a provider, supplier or any owner or managing employee was convicted of a Federal or State felony (within the preceding 10 years) that CMS determines is detrimental to the best interests of the Medicare program and its beneficiaries. [read post]
24 May 2007, 10:40 am
Plough, Inc., that state law would not require warnings in Spanish where the FDA required only English language warnings:[W]e reject plaintiff's attempt to place on nonprescription drug manufacturers a duty to warn that is broader in scope and more onerous than that currently imposed by applicable statutes and regulations. the FDA has stressed that "it is in the best interest of the consumer, industry, and the marketplace to have uniformity in the presentation… [read post]