Search for: "State of Maine v. Morris" Results 1 - 20 of 164
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Nov 2021, 6:30 am by ernst
Their arguments (which anticipated those made in Brown v. [read post]
9 Sep 2008, 1:47 pm
The first case of the day will be Altria Group and Phillip Morris v. [read post]
15 Dec 2008, 7:41 pm
Good that a group of Maine smokers who puffed "light" cigarettes can sue Philip Morris under the state's law governing deceptive advertising. [read post]
15 Dec 2008, 2:48 pm
The case was brought by three Maine smokers who accused Philip Morris [corporate website [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 8:41 am
However, a majority of the United States Supreme Court did not buy it, and in late 2008, issued its opinion in Altria Group, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 1:14 pm by Daniel G.C. Glover
Their brand is not affiliated with the worldwide famous brand marketed by Philip Morris in the United States and many other countries. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 8:35 am by David Hart QC
36, At the hearing of the main appeal, I referred to the decision of the Court of Justice of the European Union in Case C-62/00 Marks & Spencer v IRC. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 2:29 pm by Eugene Volokh
But at this point and in this case, it is appropriate to deny certiorari, for two main reasons. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 2:10 am by sally
Supreme Court G Hamilton (Tullochgribban Mains) Ltd v The Highland Council & Anor[2012] UKSC 31 (11 July 2012) ANS & Anor v ML [2012] UKSC 30 (11 July 2012) Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) BA, R v [2012] EWCA Crim 1529 (11 July 2012) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Keay & Anor v Morris Homes (West Midlands) Ltd [2012] EWCA Civ 900 (11 July 2012) Holmes & Anor v Evans & Anor [2012] EWCA Civ 941 (11 July 2012) BA… [read post]
31 Aug 2007, 1:00 pm
The District Court held that no state law - in this case Maine Unfair Trade Practices Act. [read post]
3 Dec 2008, 5:19 pm
Roberts, Jr., as the Court was about to wind up its hearing on Philip Morris USA v. [read post]
6 Oct 2008, 5:51 pm
Philip Morris sought dismissal of the case, contending that state law claims had been displaced by the federal cigarette labeling and advertising law or FTC actions. [read post]