Search for: "State of Maine V. Crawford" Results 1 - 20 of 96
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Apr 2008, 7:26 am
That's about the best that can be said about yesterday's opinions in Crawford v. [read post]
29 Apr 2008, 7:26 am
That's about the best that can be said about yesterday's opinions in Crawford v. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 3:57 am by Russ Bensing
  In the Abdi case, which I’d discussed on Thursday, I’d filed a motion with the court of appeals right after State v. [read post]
28 Sep 2007, 7:49 am
Roberts (Crawford has no retroactive application). [read post]
1 Apr 2014, 11:17 am by Jon Sands
Roberts (pre Crawford). [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 1:07 pm by Jessica Smith
So what are the main take away points from Clark for child abuse prosecutions and Crawford issues more generally? [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 5:13 pm by Brian Shiffrin
In Melendez-Diaz v Massachusetts (129 S.Ct. 2527 [June 25, 2009]), the United States Supreme Court held that the Confrontation Clause requires that in order for the prosecution to be able to introduce a forensic laboratory report at trial, the prosecutor must present a live witness to testify to the truth of the statements made in the report subject to cross-examination. [read post]
9 May 2014, 12:36 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Although Crawford v Washington held that admission of testimonial evidence from a presently unavailable witness whom the accused had no prior opportunity to cross-examine violates the accused's Sixth Amendment right of confrontation, New York's statutory embodiment of the business record hearsay exception survived the decision in Crawford. [read post]
28 Sep 2010, 8:04 am by Kent Scheidegger
Dedman, 2004-NMSC-037, ¶¶ 30, 45-46, 136 N.M. 561,102 P.3d 628, and followed the United States Supreme Court case in Crawford v. [read post]
23 Apr 2007, 8:03 am
State courts rejected the challenge raised under the Supreme Court precedent in Crawford v.Washington. [read post]
22 Jun 2007, 3:30 pm
Roger Falk and Christopher Hughes won in State v. [read post]