Search for: "State of Maine v. Davis"
Results 101 - 120
of 390
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Nov 2019, 4:08 pm
The main political parties have now released their election manifestos. [read post]
20 Dec 2007, 3:59 am
AmBase Corp. v Davis Polk & Wardwell, 8 NY3d 428). [read post]
17 Sep 2010, 7:49 pm
Federalism by Jury in United States v. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 2:54 pm
Maine Pub. [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 10:10 am
v=%CE%B1&r=04833355782549953; R. [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 8:47 am
De Havilland v. [read post]
27 Nov 2017, 1:59 pm
[2] Davis v. [read post]
6 May 2019, 1:32 pm
Fouladi v Darout Ltd & Ors (2018) EWHC 3501 (Ch) Although the judgment is dated December 2018, this has just appeared – a case on the perennially vexed topic of noise from a flat above. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 2:05 am
The Court of Appeal (Dame Victoria Sharp P, Sir Geoffrey Vos C and Davis LJ) unanimously allowed Mr Lloyd’s appeal (with the Chancellor giving the only substantive judgment), granting him permission to serve out. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 8:28 am
Secretary of State of Energy and Climate Change [20.09.2013], Mansfield County Court, in which District Judge Davies, having heard submissions from both parties, ruled in favour of the Defendant (represented by Nabarro LLP) and held that NIHL is not a disease within the meaning of CPR 45.23 and therefore the 62.5% success fee did not apply. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 9:01 pm
” Harassment law divided into two main questions: Did actionable harassment occur? [read post]
9 Oct 2015, 9:15 am
Obergefell v. [read post]
29 Jun 2014, 9:01 pm
As I explained, the main problem with the repeal effort is Article II, section 10(c) of California Constitution. [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 1:07 pm
United States v. [read post]
16 Dec 2022, 7:25 am
Mr Davies QC for Mr and Mrs Brake submitted that they were invited to bid for the cottage and the process was unfair, unlawful and unconscionable. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
By our count, federal judges have trampled over state sovereignty with respect to the heeding presumption in no fewer than eleven states – Alaska, Colorado (despite contrary state-court authority), Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, New York (despite contrary state-court authority), South Dakota, and Wyoming.Finally, because various states have taken quite different approaches to whether a heeding presumption exists at… [read post]
21 Nov 2019, 6:03 am
-Main 1.67 $97,238 $58,100 Yeshiva Univ. 1.68 $111,031 $66,000 Cleveland State Univ. 1.68 $83,868 $49,800 Washburn Univ. 1.68 $82,194 $48,800 Univ. of New Mexico-Main 1.69 $83,999 $49,600 Pace Univ. 1.69 $102,821 $60,700 Univ. of St Thomas 1.70 $84,261 $49,600 St John's Univ. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 7:13 am
The new case, Davis v. [read post]
5 Jul 2022, 5:32 am
From Murphy v. [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 3:57 am
In North Carolina v. [read post]
