Search for: "State of Maine v. Dunn"
Results 1 - 20
of 90
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jun 2015, 3:00 am
To the extent that the state court based its conclusion on the IQ score of 75, the Court cited Hall v. [read post]
21 Aug 2009, 2:55 am
Rachel Pickering won in State v. [read post]
Expert Witness Testimony: The Difference Between Testing Scientific Principles and Determining Cause
17 Mar 2011, 4:30 am
In Dunn v. [read post]
29 Nov 2018, 9:00 pm
The lawsuit does not involve provisional ballots, signature matches or counting delays—logistical aspects of modern elections that are increasingly subject to legal dispute—but instead attacks the basic substantive rules that Maine law uses to determine who wins Congressional elections.The crux of the legal challenge is the permissibility of Maine’s Ranked-Choice Voting system, which the state’s voters adopted via a citizen initiative in 2016 and… [read post]
8 Nov 2014, 5:53 pm
United States v. [read post]
5 Jun 2018, 8:00 pm
Dunn. [read post]
25 Mar 2009, 6:00 am
Theodore Boutrous of Gibson Dunn & Crutcher argued for Wal-Mart. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 3:48 am
SCOTUS Interprets SLUSA Narrowly: Rare Win for Plaintiffs Securities Bar Here's an excerpt from this Gibson Dunn memo (other memos are posted in our "Blue Sky" Practice Area): On February 26, 2014, the Supreme Court decided Chadbourne & Parke LLP v. [read post]
28 Mar 2019, 9:24 pm
Collier are very similar to those of Dunn v. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 2:05 am
La. 1988), aff'd, 864 F.2d 789 (5th Cir. 1988).Maine: Porter v. [read post]
7 Apr 2008, 5:03 am
Dunn [read post]
24 Dec 2008, 1:35 pm
United States v. [read post]
28 Jan 2024, 8:49 pm
Trump v. [read post]
28 Jul 2022, 9:05 pm
The five most popular proposal topics in 2022, representing 49% of all shareholder proposal submissions, were (i) climate change, (ii) special meetings, (iii) anti-discrimination and diversity, (iv) independent chair, and (v) lobbying spending and political contributions (which tied for fifth most common proposal topic). [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 2:05 pm
Proportionally restricting free speech rights In Murphy v IRTC Barrington J explained that, when there is a restriction on a constitutional right, the state can justify it if it meets a legitimate aim and is proportionate to that aim. [read post]
9 Feb 2023, 9:45 am
Moore received a text message from Dunn stating that Mr. [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 9:01 pm
The (in)famous Bush v. [read post]
2 Apr 2024, 4:21 am
Taylor Jr. v. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 9:04 am
See State v. [read post]
