Search for: "State of Maine v. Holland"
Results 1 - 20
of 51
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Apr 2011, 9:55 am
The main issue that was not decided was whether the Control Company probe is reliable. [read post]
25 Jul 2014, 1:20 pm
The statute, after all, implemented the CWC, and the main point of Holland has been that federalism does not constrain implementing legislation. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 11:32 am
The Supreme Court ruling in United States v. [read post]
3 Jan 2013, 6:08 am
Enbridge Gas Distribution Inc. has won an appeal from the dismissal of its small claims court action against a contractor over damage caused to a gas main in Holland Landing, Ontario. [read post]
12 Oct 2009, 8:24 am
The People's Republic of Bangladesh v. [read post]
2 Dec 2015, 10:42 am
Yesterday the high court heard argument in a case involving equitable tolling of statutes of limitation, and the main precedent being discussed was Holland v. [read post]
23 Jun 2013, 7:15 am
United States, 2013 U.S. [read post]
7 Nov 2013, 5:00 am
This recent article by Kelley Holland in USA Today may be of interest to readers of this blog. [read post]
25 Apr 2017, 3:12 am
Giving the main judgment, Lord Toulson held that a decision to prosecute an asylum seeker for entering with false documents does not breach ECHR, art 8. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 6:32 am
On October 13th, 2011, the European Court of Justice held in Prism Investments BV v. [read post]
26 Apr 2019, 9:53 am
The trial court entered final judgment against Rohrmoos, stating: 1. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 11:20 am
” The New York Times Artsbeat Blog reports on Justice Scalia’s role as an unlikely “script doctor” in response to a screenwriter hoping to write a comedy about Maine seceding from the United States. [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 2:40 am
This was the situation that Albert Holland placed at the doorstep of the Supreme Court in Holland v. [read post]
12 Oct 2021, 6:40 am
Mujo v. [read post]
24 Sep 2009, 5:09 am
Crown Equipment Corp., 501 F.3d 75, 78 (1st Cir. 2007) (applying Maine law); Ahlberg v. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 1:31 am
Crown Equipment Corp., 501 F.3d 75, 78 (1st Cir. 2007) (applying Maine law); Ahlberg v. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 1:31 am
Crown Equipment Corp., 501 F.3d 75, 78 (1st Cir. 2007) (applying Maine law); Ahlberg v. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 1:31 am
Crown Equipment Corp., 501 F.3d 75, 78 (1st Cir. 2007) (applying Maine law); Ahlberg v. [read post]
11 Apr 2014, 4:50 am
Anticipating the theory later made famous by Justice Sutherland in United States v. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 9:53 am
It is the only part of the Necessary and Proper Clause quoted by Chief Justice Marshall in United States v. [read post]
