Search for: "State of Maine v. Mark T. Smith" Results 1 - 20 of 124
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Oct 2015, 2:30 am by Jani Ihalainen
Luckily, the European Court of Justice answered this question over a month ago.The case of Iron & Smith v Unilever dealt with a national application for the mark "be Impulsive" in Hungary, lodged by Iron & Smith. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 9:36 am
| 3-D Lego trade mark | Garcia v Google | B+ subgroup | EU trade mark reform and counterfeits in transit | French v Battistelli | US v Canada over piracy | UK Supreme Court in Starbucks |  BASCA v The Secretary of State for Business | Patent litigation, music, politics | Product placement in Japan.Never too late 50 [week ending on Sunday 7 June] - Swiss claims | Italian-sounding trade marks for… [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 8:25 am by Gabriel Chin
Yesterday the Supreme Court heard argument in United States v. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 12:23 pm
| Hospira v Genetech Mark 1, the Appeal | [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 7:07 am by Eleonora Rosati
Standard International Management v EUIPO Case T-768/20 EU General Court (July 2022)Can a hotel in the United States use an EU trade mark? [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 1:47 am
 | Criminalisation of IP and economics | Keeping count of blocked websites in the UK |Birkin Bags | Patentability of user interface designs in Germany |Smith & Nephew v ConvaTec | Report on IPEC litigation |does Twitter have a future? [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:28 am by Carolina Attorneys
The main factors he alleged were his change in employment and Plaintiff’s interference with his limited visitation schedule. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 5:00 am
  It doesn’t fit, and the combination isn’t very appetizing. [read post]
7 May 2009, 6:08 am
As the court stated in McClain:[A]nother methodological problem undermines [the expert's] analogical approach. . . . [read post]
14 May 2020, 6:56 am by Mark Movsesian
My essay addresses some of the legal issues: whether bans are "generally applicable" under Employment Division v Smith, how courts might weigh the burden on religion against the state's interest in curbing the epidemic, whether less-restrictive means are available, etc. [read post]