Search for: "State of Michigan Judicial Court"
Results 21 - 40
of 2,251
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Mar 2024, 4:00 am
In the commentary on this principle, the Ethical Principles document states: 2.C.1 A hallmark of judicial proceedings is that all participants, including judges, will conduct themselves in a manner that preserves the honour and dignity of both the individual proceedings and the administration of justice more generally. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 4:00 am
However, proving this in court can be challenging. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 7:10 am
The official California Judicial Council self-help site for abuse victims seeking a domestic violence restraining order states: “You may not need all of these forms. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 3:37 am
Like it or not, there is a Supreme Court and it gets to make decisions that control the state of constitutional law. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 9:45 am
Judicial scrutiny of noncompetes is expected to continue Courts may be increasingly unwilling to correct facially overbroad noncompete provisions. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 7:00 am
Since then, subsequent additions to the official History of the Supreme Court of the United States have been famously unpunctual, uneven, and mostly unheralded. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 3:00 am
But endorsements by a judicial candidate can trigger ethical concerns, an issue that has been raised in upcoming votes in Alameda County and San Francisco. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 4:33 am
No representative in Congress explicitly or implicitly referred to any state or federal court decision on disqualification during the debates over the Enforcement Act. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
(I think Robert admires Taft almost as much as I admire Dean Guido Calabresi).[20] Yet, as Robert also observes, “Few now remember that Taft had forever altered the nature of the chief justiceship, the Supreme Court, or the federal judiciary[,]….his efforts at judicial reform or the construction of the contemporary Supreme Court building”[,] or “the judicial landmarks he thought he had established. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 2:35 pm
Carter (1972), in which the Court explained that for purposes of such ballot integrity and practical functioning, states can exclude from their ballots “frivolous” candidacies. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 2:02 pm
Carter (1972), in which the Court explained that for purposes of such ballot integrity and practical functioning, states can exclude from their ballots “frivolous” candidacies. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am
Supreme Court, however, Trump does not press the “under the United States” Positions Clause argument. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 7:10 am
Perhaps one or more of the possible outcome-determinative “swing” states (e.g., Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Nevada, New Hampshire, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin) would omit his name, although even that is highly speculative, as it would depend upon questions of state-law authority and who controls the executive and judicial branches of the particular state. [read post]
28 Jan 2024, 8:49 pm
Despite the fact that neither Congress nor DOJ has yet taken steps sufficient to disqualify Trump from holding federal office, he might nevertheless be constitutionally ineligible to hold any future state or federal office, including the presidency, by virtue of Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment, which provides: No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United… [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 10:49 am
Saginaw County, Michigan, 67 F.4th 284, 296 (6th Cir. 2023). [read post]
19 Jan 2024, 3:00 am
A Potentially Huge Supreme Court Case Has a Hidden Conservative Backer Yahoo News – Hiroko Tabuchi (New York Times) | Published: 1/16/2024 The Supreme Court heard arguments that, on paper, are about a group of commercial fishermen who oppose a government fee that they consider unreasonable. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 11:33 am
Trial court judges are, under their judicial robes, human beings. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 5:45 am
Five Supreme Court opinions, Twelve Supreme Court judicial opinions on circuit, ten other federal judicial opinions, more than ten legal treatises, and more than ten state court opinions offered similar analyses of the common/constitutional law of treason and insurrection. [read post]
13 Jan 2024, 1:05 pm
Drunk Driving Charges and Penalties in Michigan.Understanding Drunk Driving Offenses Drunk driving charges and penalties in Michigan are treated seriously by law enforcement and the judicial system. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 10:10 am
We found that the government has repeatedly acted to prevent judicial review by taking people off the list at strategic points in litigation. [read post]
