Search for: "State of Miss. v. United States"
Results 1 - 20
of 4,972
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 May 2024, 1:28 pm
United States (Treaty Rights; "Bad Men" Provision) Reges v. [read post]
8 May 2024, 12:09 pm
Zircon Corp. v. [read post]
7 May 2024, 9:31 am
This is recognized in the State Department’s Foreign Affairs Manual (FAM) at 9 FAM § 402.1-3 , which states that an “applicant desiring to come to the United States for one principal purpose, and one or more incidental purposes, must be classified in accordance with the principal purpose. [read post]
6 May 2024, 5:10 pm
In Dobbs v. [read post]
6 May 2024, 7:38 am
Miss Anam Abdul-Majid (LLM, University of Birmingham; LLB, University of Nairobi; BSC.IBA, United States International University; Advocate and Head of Corporate and Commercial Department, KSM Advocates, Nairobi, Kenya). [read post]
30 Apr 2024, 12:23 pm
United States (McGirt v. [read post]
30 Apr 2024, 10:53 am
Her activism commenced at the age of eighteen, when she challenged her father’s unjust imprisonment under martial law regulations in the landmark case “Miss Asma Jilani v. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 9:34 am
Leszczynski v. [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 5:57 am
The United States, like many other functioning democracies, is hardly immune from backsliding and lurching toward autocracy. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 9:25 am
Source: American Civil Liberties Union The Soviet Union and the United States raced to locate the missing sub and extract the intelligence likely inside. [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 2:07 pm
United States et al., a decision of the U.S. [read post]
5 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm
United States dissent, Congress could delegate fact-finding to the Executive Branch, but not “policy judgments. [read post]
4 Apr 2024, 10:31 am
GAO also noted that the United States Court of Federal Claims recently held in Myriddian, LLC v. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 5:06 am
United States (23-726) and Idaho v. [read post]
1 Apr 2024, 4:00 am
See Montgomery v. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 7:28 pm
-NAP exhibits all of the weaknesses and missed opportunities that has marked the NAP process for many developed states: it focuses on outward conduct and pays little attention to the human rights effects of economic activity within the United States; it is grounded in the prerogatives of executive command; it provides little assessment of the legal and remedial framework of the United States and its relationship to managing business conduct; and… [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 8:22 am
United States, 293 F. 1013, 1014 (D.C. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 5:01 am
In Hunter v. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 8:39 pm
Consulate or Embassy overseas, then you won’t want to miss this important video. [read post]
