Search for: "State of Nevada et al v. United States Department of Labor et al" Results 1 - 20 of 26
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
United States Department of Labor, et al, the United States Department of Labor has made clear that it is not defending the Obama Administration’s overtime rule that would more than double the threshold for employees to qualify for most overtime exemptions. [read post]
United States Department of Labor, et al., a judge in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas issued a nationwide preliminary injunction enjoining the United States Department of Labor (“DOL”) from implementing and enforcing the Fair Labor Standards Act (“the FLSA”) final overtime rule that would otherwise become effective on December… [read post]
United States Department of Labor, et al., a judge in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas issued a nationwide preliminary injunction enjoining the United States Department of Labor (“DOL”) from implementing and enforcing the Fair Labor Standards Act (“the FLSA”) final overtime rule that would otherwise become effective on December… [read post]
8 Sep 2017, 4:18 pm by John Ellis
United States Department of Labor, et al., Case # 4:16-cv-00731-ALM, which was consolidated with Plano Chamber of Commerce, et al. v. [read post]
Patel et al., where trial is scheduled to begin next week on March 27, 2023, and United States v. [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 2:35 pm
The Supreme Court will hear oral argument at 10 a.m. next Monday in Free Enterprise Fund, et al., v. [read post]
18 Oct 2006, 5:26 pm
ADB Utility Contractors, Inc. (14-CA-27386, et al.; 348 NLRB No. 53) St. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 6:44 am by Christa Culver
California Pharmacists AssociationDocket: 09-1158Issue(s): (1) Whether Medicaid recipients and providers may maintain a cause of action under the Supremacy Clause to enforce § 1396a(a)(30)(A) by asserting that the provision preempts a state law reducing reimbursement rates; and (2) whether a state law reducing Medicaid reimbursement to providers may be held preempted by § 1396a(a)(30)(A) based on requirements that do not appear in the text of the statute.Certiorari-Stage… [read post]