Search for: "State of New York et al v. Trump et al" Results 41 - 60 of 176
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jan 2021, 8:03 am by Eric Goldman
More likely, it’s because law enforcement has invested less in child sex trafficking enforcement post-FOSTA for well-documented reasons. * Kendra Albert et al, FOSTA in Legal Context (2020). [read post]
18 Dec 2020, 1:00 pm by Ilya Somin
" Reply Brief for United States 6; see also Brief for Appellees New York Immigration Coalition et al. 15 (citing a prior Government estimate that doing so will exclude approximately "50,000 ICE detainees"). [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 5:08 pm by Natalma M. McKnew
Several state Attorneys General challenged the new regulation in New York et al v. [read post]
9 Nov 2020, 7:20 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
First up will be the ACA's defenders, the intervenor states (California, et al.) and the House of Representatives, followed by the Solicitor General and the plaintiffs. [read post]
Supreme Court Weighs In In June 2020, the Supreme Court issued a ruling in Department of Homeland Security et al. v. [read post]
Supreme Court Weighs In In June 2020, the Supreme Court issued a ruling in Department of Homeland Security et al. v. [read post]
7 Oct 2020, 8:32 am by James Romoser
Montana, et al.: Specific Jurisdiction’s Next Mile Marker (Nathaniel Fowler, Frost Brown Todd) We rely on our readers to send us links for our round-up. [read post]
24 Aug 2020, 1:15 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
(the states defending the ACA) 10 minutes for the House of Representatives 20 minutes for the Solicitor General 20 minutes for Texas, et al. [read post]
Resources Code, § 21000 et seq.) when the state is acting on its own behalf and exercising its discretion in deciding to pursue licensing for a hydroelectric dam project? [read post]
22 Jun 2020, 7:10 am by Eric Goldman
” Given that Trump did the same thing in his presentation of third-party content, he seems to be arguing in the EO that he should not have qualified for Section 230 in 2017. 2) Cockrum et al v. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 4:23 am by Tammy Binford, Contributing Editor
Clayton County is a Georgia case in which a county employee was fired after he joined a gay softball league.Altitude Express, Inc., et al. v. [read post]