Search for: "State of New York et al v. United States Department of Justice et al"
Results 61 - 80
of 255
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Sep 2011, 9:30 am
Texas Thomas More Law Center, et al. v. [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 1:04 pm
Al Nashiri The proceedings in United States v. [read post]
16 Jun 2022, 8:36 am
Khary Penebaker et al v. [read post]
18 Sep 2014, 9:01 pm
Government is not a party to this defamation lawsuit—Victor Restis et al. v. [read post]
28 May 2011, 5:06 pm
Danielczyk, et al. [read post]
14 Sep 2009, 6:01 am
United States and Black, et al. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 10:05 pm
At 10 a.m. next Monday, the Supreme Court will hold one hour of oral argument on a case that implicates the constitutional authority of all three branches of the government: Zivotofsky, et al., v. [read post]
17 Aug 2015, 12:15 pm
Recently the United States Department of Justice intervened in a whistleblower complaint filed in the Southern District of New York involving Continuum Health Partners in United States ex. [read post]
28 Jan 2023, 7:32 am
The state and its instrumentalities tend to be risk averse--the essence of the ideology of compliance based governmentality. [read post]
11 Jan 2024, 1:24 pm
Lowe, et al.). [read post]
11 Nov 2010, 8:17 am
Massey Coal Company, Inc., et al., the Court’s 2009 judicial recusal case. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 9:55 am
Preet Bharara, the United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York, and Michele M. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 12:11 am
Department of Justice has stated that the criminal division has started a far-reaching probe, and that they are “responding aggressively and taking it very seriously. [read post]
28 Apr 2014, 8:43 am
City of New York, New York, et al - Apr 21: In the U.S. [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 7:57 am
This summer, she goes to trial in United States v. [read post]
1 Jan 2019, 9:01 pm
This amendment set out New YorkState's response to the United States Supreme Court's decision in Janus v American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, et al, 138 SCt 2448.In Janus the high court held that states and public-sector unions may no longer require "nonconsenting employees" in a collective bargaining unit to pay an "agency shop fee" in lieu of becoming… [read post]
1 Jan 2019, 9:01 pm
This amendment set out New YorkState's response to the United States Supreme Court's decision in Janus v American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, et al, 138 SCt 2448.In Janus the high court held that states and public-sector unions may no longer require "nonconsenting employees" in a collective bargaining unit to pay an "agency shop fee" in lieu of becoming… [read post]
8 Aug 2014, 6:05 pm
As we know, under the due process clauses of the New York State Constitution, Article I, § 6, and the United States Constitution, Fourteenth Amendment, evidence of a pretrial identification of the defendant is inadmissible if the procedure used is “unnecessarily suggestive” (Neil v Biggers, 409 US 188 [1972]; People v Adams, 53 NY2d 241 [1981]; People v Owens, 74 NY2d 677 [1989]; People v Farraro, 144… [read post]
30 Oct 2010, 12:02 pm
United States Patent and Trademark Office, et al. [read post]
17 May 2010, 5:49 am
Justice Clark read his opinion for the Court in United States v. [read post]
