Search for: "State of New York v Skanska"
Results 1 - 9
of 9
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jul 2010, 2:35 pm
City of New York, et.al., decided on July 13, 2010, The Appellate Division, Second Department, affirmed the granting of Summary judgment against a prime contractor/construction manager despite the prime contractor not being in privity of contract with plaintiff's employer. [read post]
18 Nov 2019, 4:00 am
The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey [Port Authority] is an interstate compact agency and thus is not subject to New York legislation governing with respect to its internal operations' unless and until both New York and New Jersey having enacted legislation providing that such legislation is applicable to the Port Authority.Plaintiff sued the Port Authority and Skanska USA Inc., and Skanska USA… [read post]
18 Nov 2019, 4:00 am
The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey [Port Authority] is an interstate compact agency and thus is not subject to New York legislation governing with respect to its internal operations' unless and until both New York and New Jersey having enacted legislation providing that such legislation is applicable to the Port Authority.Plaintiff sued the Port Authority and Skanska USA Inc., and Skanska USA… [read post]
18 Nov 2019, 4:00 am
The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey [Port Authority] is an interstate compact agency and thus is not subject to New York legislation governing with respect to its internal operations' unless and until both New York and New Jersey having enacted legislation providing that such legislation is applicable to the Port Authority.Plaintiff sued the Port Authority and Skanska USA Inc., and Skanska USA… [read post]
17 Dec 2007, 7:34 am
DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Civil Practice Privilege Issues Defeat Release of Bulk of State License Materials Sought by Nonprofit as to Logo The Children First Foundation Inc. v. [read post]
15 Mar 2007, 1:10 am
Israel Discount Bank of New York U.S. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 3:25 am
In a 3-2 decision The New York Appellate Division, 3d Department, in GROVE v. [read post]
27 Oct 2009, 1:40 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKEmployment
Evidence Shows Employer's Stated Reason for Firing Woman Was a Pretext for Pregnancy Discrimination
Ramos v. [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 6:03 pm
But must there be some evidence of distracted driving before discovery of the driver's cell phone or wireless device records are discoverable under New York State law? [read post]