Search for: "State of North Dakota v. EPA"
Results 1 - 20
of 89
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jan 2024, 1:08 pm
EPA Judge orders removal of wind farm opposed by Osage Judge orders new North Dakota legislative district for 2 Native American Tribes South Dakota city asks Oglala Sioux Tribe to waive sovereign immunity to fulfill records request [read post]
26 Dec 2023, 2:17 pm
Even if Minnesota claimed that pollution emitters in North Dakota were harming the state, Minnesota couldn't hale the North Dakota emitters to court. [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 12:44 pm
(Joinder; Tribal Sovereign Immunity) United States v. [read post]
10 May 2023, 1:55 pm
Federal Courts Bulletinhttps://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/federal/2023.html United States v. [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 10:58 am
In light of the preliminary injunctions in North Dakota and Texas, EPA said that both agencies are interpreting “waters of the United States” consistent with the pre-2015 regulatory regime in the 26 states where the WOTUS Rule is blocked “until further notice. [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 10:58 am
In light of the preliminary injunctions in North Dakota and Texas, EPA said that both agencies are interpreting “waters of the United States” consistent with the pre-2015 regulatory regime in the 26 states where the WOTUS Rule is blocked “until further notice. [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 10:58 am
In light of the preliminary injunctions in North Dakota and Texas, EPA said that both agencies are interpreting “waters of the United States” consistent with the pre-2015 regulatory regime in the 26 states where the WOTUS Rule is blocked “until further notice. [read post]
13 Apr 2023, 9:05 pm
EPA’s revised definition of WOTUS then had a few days until the North Dakota court ruled, sending EPA back to its 2015 rulebook. [read post]
28 Jan 2023, 7:32 am
The state and its instrumentalities tend to be risk averse--the essence of the ideology of compliance based governmentality. [read post]
25 Aug 2022, 9:03 pm
A federal judge in North Dakota rejected a lawsuit seeking to prevent the Justice Department from implementing the new restrictions. [read post]
29 Jun 2022, 11:24 pm
S. 706, 728.Consistent with these principles, the Court long ago found structural waiver as to suits between States, see South Dakota v. [read post]
22 Jun 2022, 2:52 am
S. 536, 546, or if it regulates them unfavorably on some basis related to their governmental “status,” North Dakota v. [read post]
27 Feb 2022, 3:03 pm
” Two coal-mining companies and 20 Republican-led states, including West Virginia and North Dakota, asked the Supreme Court to review the D.C. [read post]
17 Dec 2021, 4:07 pm
EPA and North Dakota v. [read post]
1 Dec 2021, 7:38 pm
On Monday, a federal judge there granted a request for preliminary injunction, barring the CMS rule from going into effect in the ten plaintiff states (Missouri, Nebraska, Arkansas, Kansas, Iowa, Wyoming, Alaska, South Dakota, North Dakota, and New Hampshire). [read post]
30 Oct 2021, 12:23 pm
EPA, and North Dakota v. [read post]
29 Oct 2021, 3:55 pm
EPA, and North Dakota v. [read post]
29 Oct 2021, 2:03 pm
North Dakota v. [read post]
27 Oct 2021, 9:15 am
(relisted after the Sept. 27, Oct. 8 and Oct. 15 conferences) North American Coal Corporation v. [read post]
14 Oct 2021, 11:08 am
§ 841(a)(l) as defined in United States v. [read post]
