Search for: "State of Ohio Superior Court"
Results 21 - 40
of 690
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jan 2014, 6:18 am
Auer’s Proposed Counter Proposition of Law: In the state of Ohio, when a real estate salesperson acts in the name of a real e [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 10:57 am
Superior Court, 2011 WL 6382110 (Cal. [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 3:15 pm
: The Ohio Supreme Court yesterday ruled that Ohio law does not provide a vehicle for death row inmates to challenge the state's method of execution. [read post]
7 Sep 2017, 1:42 pm
In United States v. [read post]
1 Apr 2022, 7:57 am
On March 16, the Ohio Supreme Court rejected Republican redistricting maps for a third time. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 7:18 am
A second round (2005-2006) included a Senate effort to increase for the state’s main trial court judges (Superior Court) only. [read post]
3 Mar 2016, 11:21 am
Ohio River Company, 351 F. [read post]
20 Feb 2023, 2:02 pm
That means a railroad worker can file a lawsuit against the employer in any state or federal court. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 5:27 am
Superior Court of Ventura County, employees worked on a vessel that provided maintenance services to offshore oil platforms located outside California’s boundaries. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 4:03 am
Superior Court, 464 U.S. 501, 510, 104 S.Ct. 819, 824, 78 L.Ed.2d 629 (1984). [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 10:57 am
Superior Court, 2011 WL 6382110 (Cal. [read post]
29 Dec 2010, 5:26 am
” United States v. [read post]
12 Jul 2023, 3:54 pm
What would be most remarkable about the substitution of the skepticism regime for the deference regime is that the deference regime is, in every respect, normatively superior. [read post]
19 Jan 2010, 1:17 pm
The governor of Ohio and an attorney working for Ohio's Bureau of Workers Compensation are disagreeing about what is a "typical whistleblower situation. [read post]
17 Mar 2011, 3:08 am
Superior Ct. (1989), 215 Cal.App.3d 528, 536, 263 Cal. [read post]
14 Jun 2009, 10:49 pm
Nevertheless, we're discussing it for three reasons: (1) there's no reason Pauley can't be cited outside Pennsylvania, (2) it contains a significant discussion of Ohio law, and (3) the Superior Court non-citation mandate may well violate the Open Courts provision of the state's constitution.Here are the main holdings in Pauley:(1) Both Ohio and Pennsylvania follow the learned intermediary rule. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 5:00 am
Since the decision in Pennsylvania is not binding in Ohio, there is no clear direction in our state whether an Ohio court would follow the Pennsylvania decision or go in another direction. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 7:23 am
Such is the recent Bucks County case on appeal to the Pennsylvania Superior Court. [read post]
11 May 2017, 11:45 am
On May 3, 2017, the Supreme Court of Ohio heard oral argument in the case, Anthony Rush and Tammy Rush v. [read post]
8 Aug 2017, 9:05 am
By Rachel Burke Recent decisions from the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court and a Rhode Island Superior Court have held that a discharged employee and a rejected applicant, both of whom tested positive for marijuana, may pursue disability discrimination claims under state law. [read post]
