Search for: "State of Ohio v. Christopher C. Brown" Results 1 - 19 of 19
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Apr 2015, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Helfand; articles by Michelle Greenberg-Kobrin, Christopher C. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 3:43 am by Russ Bensing
” The fact that the judge hadn’t used the exact words of the rule wasn’t disposite; three years ago, in State v. [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 1:00 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD
Health Reform Erin Fuse Brown, Georgia State University College of Law, Could States Do Single-Payer? [read post]
22 Nov 2012, 12:27 am by legalinformatics
Seuss’s Bartholomew and the Oobleck Christopher R. [read post]
25 Dec 2016, 9:31 pm by RegBlog
Courts Regulating the Regulators Christopher Walker (Ohio State University Moritz College of Law) | Monday, April 25 Recent cases and proposed legislation reveal decreasing deference to agencies’ interpretation of their own regulations. [read post]
24 Aug 2019, 6:30 am by Dan Ernst
James Room)Panel 3: The Disciplinary State, 2:00-3:30Chair: Erin Braatz, Suffolk University Law School (ebraatz@suffolk.edu)Commentator: Lauren Benton, Vanderbilt University (lauren.benton@vanderbilt.edu)Stacey Hynd, University of Exeter (s.hynd@exeter.ac.uk) (Re-)Constructing Murder: Capital Punishment and the Criminalization of African Bodies in Colonial Ghana, c. 1890-1957Dior Konate, South Carolina State University (dkonate@scsu.edu) Imprisonment and… [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 7:24 am by Katherine Kelley
Like the original Brookings report, I collected data on sextortion occurring both within and outside of the United States. [read post]
8 Jun 2018, 12:30 pm by Dan Ernst
  THURSDAY The Rights Revolution in Action: The Transformation of State Institutions after the 1960sThu, 6/7: 8:00 AM—9:45 AM, Sheraton Centre Toronto, Forest Hill ·         Chair/Discussant—Sara Mayeux, Vanderbilt University ·         Ingraham v. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 5:36 am by Guest Author
This paper is much narrower—Sunstein is really unpacking some of the conservative SCOTUS bloc’s internal debates about the MQD in Biden v. [read post]