Search for: "State of Ohio v. Joe Brooks" Results 1 - 13 of 13
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Jan 2016, 9:01 pm by Ronald D. Rotunda
In 2006, Howard received $2.5 million in compensation from the State of Ohio. [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 12:31 am
- Cleveland attorney Joe Koncelik of Frantz Ward in his Ohio Environmental Law Blog NGOs Charged With Playing Larger Role in Climate Regulation and Climate Litigation - New York lawyer Jennifer Liu of Howrey on the firm's Global Climate Law Blog Criminal Background Checks - Act 73's Impact on Pennsylvania Employers - State College attorney John Baker of McNees Wallace & Nurick on the firm's Pennsylvania Labor and Employment Blog … [read post]
17 Jan 2011, 3:13 pm by Betsy McKenzie
(see brief article here by attorney Mark Bello announcing in summer, 2009, Ohio House Bill 248 effective August 27, 2008, Ohio Revised Code § 1349.55) (Mark Bello turns out to work for Lawsuit Finance, and blogs at Lawsuit Finance Blog) (Ohio's Supreme Court had first declared litigation finance barred by champerty, in Rancman v. [read post]
12 Aug 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Herrera Velutini and Rossini allegedly paid more than $300,000 to consultants who supported Vázquez Garced’s campaign. [read post]
15 Aug 2008, 5:00 am
Is this (“Approval Ratings: The Public v. [read post]
26 Aug 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
White Coats in the State Capital: OB-GYNs become political force in abortion wars Yahoo News – Alice Miranda Ollstein and Megan Messerly (Politico) | Published: 8/22/2022 Physicians, many of whom have never mobilized politically, are banding together in the wake of the Supreme Court overturning Roe v. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 3:31 am
Spiro, Globalization and the (Foreign Affairs) Constitution, 63 OHIO STATE L.J. 649, 667-73 (2002); see also Richard H. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 10:44 am by admin
– Robbyn Brook, PETA Media Center, April 6, 2010 The U.S. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 10:57 am by admin
“It is critical that the state not offer carbon credits for business-as-usual management by timber companies or, worse, encourage clearcutting and other destructive logging practices while doing nothing to address the immediate impacts of climate change. [read post]