Search for: "State of Oklahoma v. United States Environmental Protection Agency et al"
Results 1 - 20
of 27
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jun 2012, 1:21 pm
The Appeals Court issued a brief order indicating, "Petitioners, the State of Oklahoma, Oklahoma Industrial Energy Consumers, and the Oklahoma Gas & Electric Company, seek a stay pending review of that portion of the Environmental Protection Agency's final rule requiring the reduction of sulfur dioxide emissions at four electric generating units. [read post]
29 Jan 2018, 3:25 pm
The Tenth Circuit case is Chamber of Commerce of the U.S, et al. v. [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 10:58 am
Environmental Protection Agency et al. [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 10:58 am
Environmental Protection Agency et al. [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 10:58 am
Environmental Protection Agency et al. [read post]
12 Oct 2022, 2:34 pm
United States Army Corps of Engineers, et al. [read post]
7 Dec 2022, 2:26 pm
United States Department of the Interior, et al. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 1:44 pm
Dec 30: In one of the last official judicial environmental actions of 2011, the United States Court of Appeals for the D.C. [read post]
11 Jan 2019, 9:17 am
Environmental Protection Agency (Tribal Consultation; Clean Water Act; Mining)Seneca Nation v. [read post]
11 Jan 2019, 9:17 am
Environmental Protection Agency (Tribal Consultation; Clean Water Act; Mining)Seneca Nation v. [read post]
21 Sep 2022, 2:43 pm
Oklahoma) Birdbear et al. v. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 7:59 pm
Brown and David Matusow, Bahr, et al. v. [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 3:20 pm
Provencio, et al. [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 3:20 pm
Provencio, et al. [read post]
12 Apr 2019, 8:15 am
Provencio, et al. [read post]
28 Jan 2023, 7:32 am
(A Systematic Literature Review of Socially Reposnible Investing (SRI) and Environmental Social Givernnace (ESG), p- 25). [read post]
11 Jan 2019, 9:31 am
Environmental Protection Agency (Tribal Consultation; Clean Water Act; Mining) Seneca Nation v. [read post]
22 Sep 2022, 6:30 am
A second follow-up case, Steinmetz et al v Germany, was filed in 2022. [read post]
31 Mar 2021, 1:32 pm
The outcome of this case could have a significant impact on his strategy going forward. [1] The states are Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, Georgia, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota, Texas, Utah, West Virginia, and Wyoming. [2] Texas, et al. v. [read post]
31 Mar 2021, 1:32 pm
The outcome of this case could have a significant impact on his strategy going forward. [1] The states are Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, Georgia, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota, Texas, Utah, West Virginia, and Wyoming. [2] Texas, et al. v. [read post]
