Search for: "State of Oregon v. Long"
Results 181 - 200
of 981
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jul 2014, 11:54 am
” In State v. [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 2:59 pm
Employers that already provide benefits equivalent to or greater than the state program may be exempt from Oregon’s new requirements. [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 2:59 pm
Employers that already provide benefits equivalent to or greater than the state program may be exempt from Oregon’s new requirements. [read post]
2 Sep 2008, 6:50 pm
Oregon (1972), which allows states to adopt non-unanimous decision rules in the criminal jury context. [read post]
9 Jun 2008, 3:07 pm
United States Ex Rel. [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 3:22 am
That’s why EFF yesterday filed an amicus brief along with the ACLU and the ACLU of Oregon in United States v. [read post]
17 May 2021, 11:01 am
The geographical impact of Monday’s decision is limited to Louisiana and Oregon – the only two states that have allowed non-unanimous jury verdicts in recent years. [read post]
31 Jan 2013, 3:07 am
Oregon Health Scis. [read post]
25 Jul 2014, 1:18 pm
Gaither v. [read post]
8 Oct 2009, 1:33 pm
Download Oregon Mutual Insurance Company v. [read post]
18 Jul 2021, 9:01 pm
This means that in Louisiana and Oregon, the two states that previously allowed nonunanimous juries to convict, any final, nonunanimous jury convictions will remain in effect, undisturbed by the Court’s recent holding in Ramos v. [read post]
7 May 2008, 5:42 am
"Oregon law has long recognized that the fact that a defendant's negligence poses a threat of future physical harm is not sufficient, standing alone, to constitute an actionable injury. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 12:53 pm
Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor in her concurring opinion in United States v. [read post]
25 Feb 2018, 8:38 am
Aubry Johnson v. [read post]
19 Nov 2019, 9:41 am
In 2000, the Eleventh Circuit held in Joel v. [read post]
29 Dec 2023, 8:09 am
MySpace opinion made this clear fifteen years ago, but plaintiffs keep trying to overturn this long-standing legal principle. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 1:48 pm
The Appeals Court also affirmed the fine imposed saying, "The Apprendi issue is close but the Supreme Court's recent decision in Oregon v. [read post]
10 Nov 2012, 2:14 pm
Under diversity jurisdiction, federal courts are authorized to hear cases when the opposing parties are citizens of different states, as long as the amount in controversy is at least $75,000.U.S. [read post]
9 Jun 2019, 7:26 am
While the Supreme Court stated in its 2010 decision, Graham v. [read post]
