Search for: "State of South Carolina v. United States et al" Results 21 - 40 of 153
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 May 2013, 6:38 am by Mike Underwood
Circuit Court of Appeal issued its decision in National Ass'n of Manufacturers, et al. v. [read post]
26 Nov 2014, 11:27 am
On page twelve, at the very top, appears this brief notation:No. 118186 - The Diocese of Quincy et al., respondents, v. [read post]
8 Jun 2018, 8:56 am by Steven Cohen
Mayberry et alUnited States District Court – Eastern District of Missouri – June 8th, 2018) involves a civil rights claim under 42 USC section 1983 and 1988. [read post]
27 Jan 2022, 2:22 pm by Florian Mueller
Interestingly (but this doesn't weaken the effort in the slightest) Epic's home state of North Carolina is not among them.Here's the 35 state AGs' amicus brief (this post continues below the document):22-01-27 Utah Et Al. [read post]
1 Oct 2007, 8:03 am
Reynolds, et al. -- immunity of wholesale discount prices to challenge under Robinson-Patman Act solely because they are available to all buyers. 06-1617, Gilles v. [read post]
18 Oct 2019, 8:21 am by Steven Cohen
Dick’s Sporting Goods Inc et alUnited States District Court – District of South Carolina – October 18th, 2019) involves a products liability case involved a CORE Bioflex athletic cup, manufactured by the defendant Shock Doctor and sold by the defendant Dick’s Sporting Goods. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 1:13 pm by Mike Underwood
Chamber of Commerce of the United States, et al. v. [read post]
2 Dec 2021, 2:55 am by Kevin Kaufman
Pappas et al. find that counterfeit cigarettes can have as much as seven times the lead of authentic brands, and close to three times as much thallium, a toxic heavy metal.[14] Other sources report finding insect eggs, dead flies, mold, and human feces in counterfeit cigarettes.[15] During prohibition of alcohol in the United States during the 1920s, increased enforcement did not manage to significantly decrease the prevalence of bootlegging because the… [read post]
19 Aug 2013, 8:06 am by Sheldon Toplitt
Alsup last week ruled Checker (nee Ernest Evans) may pursue a $500 million trademark infringement claim against defendants Hewlett-Packard and Palm, Inc.The case, Ernest Evans et al. v. [read post]
3 Aug 2017, 12:13 pm
Yesterday, almost two years after hearing arguments, the Supreme Court of South Carolina finally issued its decision in the case of The Protestant Episcopal Diocese of South Carolina, et al. v. [read post]
30 May 2009, 12:29 pm
United States Forest Service, et al. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 8:32 am by jeffreynewmanadmin
  The lawsuit resolved by this settlement is captioned United States of America, et al., ex rel. [read post]