Search for: "State of Texas v. U.s., Interstate Commerce Commission"
Results 41 - 60
of 67
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jul 2015, 1:34 pm
The Chief Justice stated that “[s]elling produce in interstate commerce, although certainly subject to reasonable governmental regulation, is not a special governmental benefit that the Government may hold hostage, to be ransomed by the waiver of constitutional protection”. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 12:00 pm
United States Election Assistance Commission 14-1164Issue: (1) Whether Article I, Section 2 and the Seventeenth Amendment of the U.S. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 3:21 pm
The Lanham Act derives from the Commerce Clause, not the Spending Clause, and its purpose is to regulate marks used in interstate commerce — not to subsidize the markholders. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 7:52 am
The new year took an early turn for the worse with our reigning relist heavyweight, Kalamazoo County Road Commission v. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 9:57 am
Verizon New York, Inc. 14-439Issue: (1) Whether the exhaustion requirements of Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. [read post]
7 Jan 2015, 10:52 am
Snyder 14-571Issue: Whether a state violates the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 10:36 am
§ 1831(a) and 1832(a) of the EEA and for “misappropriation of a trade secret that is related to a product or service used in, or intended for use in, interstate or foreign commerce. [read post]
10 Sep 2014, 9:00 am
Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs v. [read post]
1 Aug 2014, 9:45 am
As the Supreme Court emphasized in 1993, “[e]ven an act of pure malice by one business competitor against another does not, without more, state a claim under the federal antitrust laws; those laws do not create a federal law of unfair competition or ‘purport to afford remedies for all torts committed by or against persons engaged in interstate commerce. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 7:34 am
First, he wanted to underscore the votes and organization of a complex set of opinions that upheld the individual insurance mandate under Congress’s taxing power but rejected its power to regulate interstate commerce and invalidated the compelled expansion of Medicaid in the states. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 11:38 am
Federal Trade Commission v. [read post]
31 Dec 2012, 7:47 pm
United States v. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 9:00 pm
Supreme Court has held that states can tax interstate commerce only if the target company has a "nexus" with the state - property or employees in the state. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 12:17 pm
The deal calls for GSK to plead guilty to introducing four types of adulterated drugs for delivery into interstate commerce from March 2003 to October 2004. [read post]
22 Sep 2010, 12:11 pm
Other cases make clear that trips within a single state are made in interstate commerce when they are part of “a practical continuity of movement of the goods” in interstate commerce. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 4:15 am
See, e.g., Fitzgerald v. [read post]
21 Aug 2010, 12:00 am
U.S. v. [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 7:50 am
Federal Election Commission and its 2007 decision in Federal Election Commission v. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 7:59 pm
Brown and David Matusow, Bahr, et al. v. [read post]
31 Jan 2010, 7:16 pm
The Nebraska U.S. [read post]
