Search for: "State v ONeil" Results 1 - 20 of 28
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jul 2016, 6:56 am by Daily Record Staff
State, 446 Md. 610 (2016), remanding the case for further consideration in light of Ray-Simmons & McGouldrick v. [read post]
17 Jan 2018, 8:04 am by Daily Record Staff
Criminal procedure — Voir dire — Batson challenge This case returns to us for the third time, and on a very narrow question: whether the Circuit Court for Baltimore City was able, two years after the fact, to analyze the State’s rationale for striking an African-American juror during voir dire at Mark O’Neil’s trial. [read post]
27 Oct 2015, 7:30 am by Daily Record Staff
Criminal procedure — Motion to suppress evidence — Social media evidence Following a jury trial in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City, Mark O’Neil, appellant, was convicted on charges of first-degree assault and the use of a handgun in a crime of violence. [read post]
19 May 2017, 7:16 am by Daily Record Staff
Criminal procedure — Motion to suppress evidence — Vehicle search By indictment filed on October 8, 2014, in the Circuit Court for Howard County (“circuit court”), the State of Maryland charged appellant, Ricardo O’Neil Brooks, with armed robbery. [read post]
6 Jan 2017, 7:42 am by Daily Record Staff
Criminal procedure — Motion to suppress evidence — Other crimes evidence The State charged Appellant Ricardo O’Neil Brooks with eight counts of robbery with a dangerous weapon, in violation of Md. [read post]
10 May 2017, 1:29 pm
Co. (1998) 71 Cal.App.4th 38, 52 [federal decisions neither binding nor controlling on matters of state law]), but are bound to follow Rusheen v. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 9:49 am by Daily Record Staff
Criminal procedure — Motion to suppress evidence — Cell phone Appellant Ricardo O’Neil Brooks moved to suppress evidence obtained from his cell phone pursuant to a warrant. [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 4:57 pm by INFORRM
Master Bell stated that he “thought long and hard about whether or not to strike out Ms O’Neill’s action in the light of this jurisprudence and came close to doing so” [46]. [read post]
7 Nov 2017, 6:40 am by MBettman
” And yet, since the landmark decision in 2002 in Republican Party of Minnesota v. [read post]