Search for: "State v Siracusa" Results 1 - 9 of 9
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Aug 2011, 3:09 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Siracusa v Sager   2011 NY Slip Op 32244(U);August 3, 2011;Supreme Court, Suffolk County; Docket Number: 06-35942; gives Judge: Peter Fox Cohalan the opportunity to review a many faceted matrimonial child support legal malpractice case. [read post]
  For example, in human rights law, a violation will occur where there has been a failure of state protection.[6] Thus, it makes no sense to speak of a human rights violation and a failure of state protection.[7] And even if a human rights violation is taken to be demonstrative of a failure of state protection (which is true in human rights discourse), the Refugee Convention speaks of a state’s inability or unwillingness to protect an applicant. [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 9:00 pm by Jan von Hein
Consistently with its reasoning in Gasser (Case C-116/02) and Turner v Grovit (Case C-259/02), the Court held in West Tankers that “even though proceedings [to enforce an arbitration agreement via an anti-suit injunction] do not come within the scope of [the Brussels I Regulation], they may nevertheless have consequences which undermine its effectiveness”, if they “prevent a court of another Member State from exercising the jurisdiction conferred on it by [the… [read post]
1 May 2024, 6:05 pm
The discussion of the Siracusa principles is particularly important, both for the way in which its application was rejected and because of the arguments made suggesting that it no longer reflects the times or current expectations. [read post]