Search for: "State v Varas"
Results 21 - 40
of 68
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Feb 2017, 9:26 am
However, the Supreme Court held in 2003, in Dastar Corp. v. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 6:17 am
In the 1994 case of Carter v. [read post]
3 Dec 2012, 7:50 am
This argument satisfied the 2-prong test set out in an earlier VARA case, Carter v. [read post]
21 Oct 2013, 10:54 am
She cited Phillips v. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 1:06 am
Some of the recent cases involving VARA claims include Cohen v. [read post]
5 May 2009, 9:30 am
United States v. [read post]
11 Mar 2019, 11:44 am
In 1990, Congress enacted the Visual Artists Rights Act (VARA), which provides limited “moral rights” of attribution and integrity to the authors of a “work of visual art. [read post]
12 May 2011, 8:15 am
” Villa v. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 11:13 am
While this proposition has seldom been addressed, the 1997 ruling in English v. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 11:13 am
While this proposition has seldom been addressed, the 1997 ruling in English v. [read post]
29 Aug 2023, 6:27 am
This case involves the interpretation of a little-known federal statute intended to protect public artistic endeavors.The case is Kerson v. [read post]
24 Mar 2009, 12:58 pm
An early decision interpreting the VARA (English v. [read post]
4 Jun 2021, 6:00 am
Supreme Court Grants Cert in Unicolors v. [read post]
22 Sep 2014, 9:02 am
In the most recent controversy, Levitt v. [read post]
20 May 2008, 1:15 am
The court relied on Smith v. [read post]
21 Feb 2020, 6:00 am
The potential grounds for abrogation of state sovereign immunity in copyright — The Supreme Court gets back to work next week after its mid-winter break, and with that comes anticipation of when it will issue its decision in Allen v. [read post]
10 Dec 2020, 7:44 am
Bork v. [read post]
20 Mar 2018, 11:43 am
In this regard, Hadley v Kemp is not an isolated instance (see Rockford Map Publishers at 148-9; Miller v Civil City of South Bend at 1093-5; Garcia v Google at 742-3). [read post]
7 Oct 2008, 5:30 pm
" NFP criminal opinions today (2): State of Indiana v. [read post]
