Search for: "State v. 119 Vote No! Committee" Results 1 - 20 of 23
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Apr 2011, 1:26 pm by WIMS
EPW Hearing State & Local Perspectives On Transportation Morrison Enterprises  v. [read post]
3 Feb 2008, 10:42 pm
Additionally, if the proposal was included in the proxy statement, the board would have had an opportunity to state its reasons for opposition. [read post]
16 Nov 2016, 1:33 pm
Firings will continue until morale improves - Merpel revisits the EPOMerpel growls in disappointment at the dismissal of Laurent Prunier, Secretary of SUEPO The Hague and member of the EPO’s Central Staff Committee. [read post]
10 Jan 2022, 9:23 am by Eugene Volokh
Unlike the state supreme court decision in Rickert v. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 6:00 am by Terry Hart
The bill easily passed the House with a vote of 378-48 in April 2017 but stalled in the Senate Rules Committee. [read post]
15 May 2009, 9:14 am
Much of this furor stems from the outrageous decision issued by the Supreme Court in Department of Commerce v. [read post]
3 Jun 2018, 4:58 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
The discipline involved Groia’s defence in R. v. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 4:40 am by Beatrice Yahia
Reports state that calm has since been restored to the area. [read post]
22 Jun 2013, 7:02 am by Benjamin Wittes
Over the past two-and-a-half years, we have published over a hundred posts on the NDAAs and related legal developments, including the Southern District of New York’s important decision in Hedges v. [read post]