Search for: "State v. A Pacheco Bonding" Results 1 - 2 of 2
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Of High Speed Rails and Litigation Snails: The Train Rolls On As Third District Rejects Additional CEQA Challenges To High-Speed Rail Authority’s Revised Final Program EIR Analyzing Central Valley To San Francisco Bay Area Track Route
4 Aug 2014, 3:17 pm by Arthur F. Coon
  Due to the state’s proprietary role with respect to the HST, as well as the Provisions of Proposition 1A (the voter-approved initiative bond measure to fund the HST) and the Authority’s established practice of complying with CEQA, the market participation doctrine applies. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Recent Decisions and Legislation - August 1, 2020
15 Aug 2020, 4:29 am by Joel R. Brandes
Tracy C., 209 AD2d 955, 955 (4th Dept. 1994))); Pacheco v. [read post]
New York Divorce and Family Law Blog - http://brandeslaw.blogspot.com/