Search for: "State v. A. P." Results 1 - 20 of 22,090
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jul 2009, 3:41 am
R (P) v Secretary of State for Justice [2009] EWCA Civ 701; [2009] WLR (D) 234 “Where it was contended, pursuant to art 2 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms as scheduled to the Human Rights Act 1998, that the state should investigate the treatment accorded to a self-harming young [...] [read post]
23 Jul 2009, 2:16 am
Regina (P) v Secretary of State for Justice Court of Appeal “A real and immediate risk to life was required to justify a self-harming young man's request that the State investigate treatment he received while detained in a young offenders institution. [read post]
9 Mar 2017, 12:00 am by D Daniel Sokol
Helmut Brokelmann and Mariarosaria Ganino ask C-449/14 P DTS v Commission: When is a Tax Measure State Aid? [read post]
6 Apr 2021, 10:57 am by Daily Record Staff
Criminal procedure — Writ of Actual Innocence — Need for a hearing In 2015, Ndokley P. [read post]
19 May 2017, 7:31 am by Daily Record Staff
Criminal procedure — Right to jury trial — Criminal contempt Matt P. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 2:53 pm by Staff
EXPUNGED- AGGRAVATED ASSAULT, POSSESSION OF PRECURSOR DRUG CHEMICALS, & AGGRAVATED DOMESTIC VIOLENCE – State v. [read post]
8 Jan 2017, 1:26 pm
”  (Leon, at p. 919, quoting United States v. [read post]
22 Aug 2017, 1:10 pm
(Cal.S.C., July 3, 2017, P. v. [read post]
17 Mar 2020, 4:18 pm by Jeffrey P. Gale, P.A.
When it comes to money, State Farm is always ready, willing and able to flex its outsized muscles. ******************************** Continue reading The post Jeffrey P. [read post]
26 Apr 2016, 1:03 pm by lennyesq
Noting that more than 20,000 NYSBA members reside or practice outside the state, President David P. [read post]
6 Oct 2009, 2:33 pm by Bartolus
Today’s judgment in Joined Cases C-501/06 P, C-513/06 P, C-515/06 P and C-519/06 P GlaxoSmithKline Services Unlimited (“GSK”) v. [read post]
7 Feb 2019, 4:47 pm by INFORRM
In the case of R (P, G and W) and Anor v Secretary of State for the Home Department and Anor [2019] UKSC 3 the Supreme Court upheld challenges to the legal regimes for disclosing criminal records in England and Wales, and Northern Ireland, finding them to be incompatible with Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights (“ECHR”). [read post]