Search for: "State v. Aarhus"
Results 1 - 20
of 38
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jun 2012, 2:54 pm
Stichting Natuur en Milieu & Pesticide Action Network Europe v. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 4:34 am
An issue is whether the Commission can be required to produce letters of formal notice to member states and reasoned opinions stating that member states are in breach of their obligations under the Treaty. [read post]
Case Preview: Protect Rural England (Kent) v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government
27 Jan 2021, 2:30 am
Secretary of State for the Home Department[4]. [read post]
18 Aug 2017, 4:32 am
Footprints of International Criminal Justice Over a Quarter of a Century AbhandlungenAndreas Buser, Colonial Injustices and the Law of State Responsibility: The CARICOM Claim to Compensate Slavery and (Native) GenocideAlessandro Bufalini, On the Power of a State to Waive Reparation Claims Arising from War Crimes and Crimes against HumanityStellungnahmen und BerichteMatthias Hartwig, Völkerrechtliche Praxis der Bundesrepublik Deutschland im Jahr 2012 [read post]
14 Jan 2009, 7:53 pm
France and Saramati v. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 11:58 am
(United States v. [read post]
22 Sep 2010, 10:09 am
Coedbach Action Team Ltd v Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change [2010] EWHC 2312 (Admin) – Read judgment A recent decision of the High Court, relating to a challenge to planning permission for a power station, could significantly limit access to environmental justice for local community groups. [read post]
30 Jul 2021, 3:00 am
In awarding costs, the judge acknowledged the claim was an Aarhus Convention claim and made cost orders in favour of each of the Secretary of State, the Council and Roxhill up to the Aarhus cost cap of £10,000. [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 12:05 am
Case NoteMarjan Peeters, Urgenda Foundation and 886 Individuals v. [read post]
17 Jul 2022, 9:52 am
Bosch & Joyeeta Gupta, Water property rights in investor-state contracts on extractive activities, affects water governance: An empirical assessment of 80 contracts in Africa and Asia Case NoteDiego Mejía-Lemos, The right to a healthy environment and its justiciability before the Inter-American Court of Human Rights: A critical appraisal of the Lhaka Honhat v Argentina judgement [read post]
3 Dec 2022, 8:23 pm
Nicola Sharman, Inter-State climate technology transfer under the UNFCCC: A benefit-sharing approach Clemens Kaupa, Scrutinizing net zero: The legal problems of counting greenhouse gas emissions, removals and offsets together Stellina Jolly, Domestic entities and access and benefit-sharing: A legal critique of Divya Pharmacy v Union of India Carola Glinski, Liability of shipowners and classification societies for environmental damage and unsafe working conditions at recycling… [read post]
12 Dec 2023, 6:57 pm
The International Adjudication of Environmental Disputes 30 Years Later Riccardo Luporini, Climate Change Litigation before International Human Rights Bodies: Insights from Daniel Billy et al. v. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 8:17 pm
University of Aarhus University of Munster v. [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 4:15 am
This purely subjective approach – assessing costs on the basis of a particular claimant - did not fulfil the Aarhus requirements as interpreted by Suliivan LJ in R (Garner) v Elmbridge Borough Council [2010] EWCA Civ 1006. [read post]
30 Jun 2017, 12:58 pm
Department for Business, Energy and Industry Strategy v. [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 4:48 am
Noting the very high threshold for review imposed by the Wednesbury test (see criticisms of this by the House of Lords in R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Daly [2001] UKHL 26,[2001] 2 AC 532 and the Strasbourg Court in Smith and Grady v United Kingdom (1999) 29 EHRR 493, para. 138) the Committee considered that the application of a “proportionality principle” by the courts in E&W could provide an adequate standard of… [read post]
21 Dec 2010, 3:27 am
Network Rail [2006] EWHC 1133 (QB) (Railtrack), or YL v. [read post]
17 May 2011, 10:55 pm
The exception was created to comply with the UK’s obligations under the Aarhus Convention. [read post]
28 Mar 2010, 3:41 pm
The inability of the RSPB to provide such an undertaking in damages led to the unfortunate consequence in the case of R. v Secretary of State for the Environment Ex p. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 1:19 am
Sign up to free human rights updates by email, Facebook, Twitter or RSS Related posts Prince Charles, oysters and environmental information Aarhus shows its teeth to Belgium Ministry of Justice on Aarhus and environmental judicial review: its get out of jail card? [read post]
