Search for: "State v. Aarhus" Results 21 - 38 of 38
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Apr 2011, 3:56 am by David Hart QC
Now to the South African case, the simplified title of which (Biowatch v. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 10:00 pm by Rosalind English
The essence of Aarhus is the requirement that participating states should make available a review procedure for environmental decisions which is ‘fair, equitable, timely and not prohibitively expensive’. [read post]
17 Apr 2011, 11:00 pm by Graeme Hall
April 15, 2011 Rosalind English ‘Fairness’ in an unfair world April 15, 2011 Rosalind English Analysis: US State Department’s review of UK Human Rights April 14, 2011 Catriona Murdoch Pearls and badgers – location, location, location April 14, 2011 David Hart QC Tick tock tick tock April 13, 2011 Adam Wagner Human rights, anti-obesity surgery and the NHS purse April 13, 2011 Adam Wagner Aarhus breaches all round? [read post]
22 May 2011, 11:20 pm by David Hart QC
This Aarhus-derived provision requires member states to provide for a route for challenging decisions involving the EIA process. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 12:39 am by Wessen Jazrawi
In the courts Hurley & Moore, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Business Innovation & Skills [2012] EWHC 201 (Admin) (17 February 2012). [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 5:36 pm by Giorgio Buono
Here’s the programme (available for download on the registration page): Wednesday, 9 May 2012 (Venue: “Roma Tre” University - Aula Magna Rettorato, Via Ostiense 159) Registration (16,00-16,30) Opening session (16,30 – 16,45) Guido Fabiani, Rector, “Roma Tre” University Savino Mazzamuto, Secretary of State, Ministry of Justice, “Roma Tre” University The Europeanisation of private law: problems and perspectives (16,45-18,30)… [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 12:02 am by Melina Padron
Sino, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWHC 2249 (Admin) (25 August 2011) October 11, 2011 5 years detention of Algerian found to be unlawful by High Court: failure to co-operate with removal does not of itself justify immigration detention. [read post]
14 Jan 2016, 1:19 am by Dina Townsend
  In Europe, the Aarhus Convention stipulates that its objective is “to contribute to the protection of the right of every person … to live in an environment adequate to his or her health and well-being. [read post]
22 Feb 2019, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
The fruition of that absorption of DP law into Article 8 is apparent in the recent decision of Catt v. [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 12:37 pm by Matthias Weller
The PIL community will have many occasions to get together in the near future, inter alia in Aarhus in May 2020. [read post]