Search for: "State v. Age"
Results 1 - 20
of 18,210
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Mar 2009, 3:10 am
Regina (Incorporated Trustees of the National Council on Ageing (Age Concern England)) v Secretary of State for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform Court of Justice of the European Communities “European member states could lawfully provide in their employment legislation for certain kinds of differences in treatment on the ground of age if those differences were objectively [...] [read post]
22 May 2012, 12:40 pm
Fifteen state attorneys general have signed this letter to US AG Eric Holder, asking him to appeal the atrocious decision of the US District Court in DC in Beaty v. [read post]
13 Oct 2009, 2:08 am
Regina (Friends of the Earth) v Secretary of State for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform; Regina (Help the Aged) v Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Court of Appeal “It was not unlawful for government ministers to consider reasonable practicability, at least to some extent by reference to departmental budgets, when taking steps to [...] [read post]
9 Mar 2009, 3:14 am
R (Incorporated Trustees of the National Council on Ageing (Age Concern England)) v Secretary of State for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform (Case C-388/07); [2009] WLR(D) 82 “National rules allowing compulsory dismissal at retirement age and non-recruitment of persons of retirement age were not contrary to Community law provided that they were justified by legitimate social [...] [read post]
10 Apr 2023, 8:19 am
Since 2014, states have had to contend with the holding of California v. [read post]
28 Dec 2005, 2:14 pm
Kroske v. [read post]
17 May 2023, 6:44 am
The post QUARRAN ALLEN v. [read post]
17 Apr 2020, 6:44 am
State of Ohio v. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 9:05 am
Age v. [read post]
8 Oct 2009, 1:48 am
Regina (Age UK) v Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills, Equality and Human Rights Commission and Another intervening) Queen’s Bench Division “Provisions permitting an employer to require retirement at the age of 65 were justified where he could show that the treatment was a proportionate means of achieving a legitimate aim since the government had [...] [read post]
5 May 2010, 8:10 pm
In JM v. [read post]
28 Jul 2023, 6:00 am
The post STEVEN MICHAEL JOHNSON v. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 1:53 am
Wintersteiger AG v Products 4U Sondermaschinenbau GmbH (Case C-523/10); [2012] WLR (D) 117 “Article 5(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 of 22 December 2000 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters meant that an action relating to infringement of a trade mark registered in a member state because of the use, by an advertiser, of a keyword identical to that trade mark on a search engine website operating… [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 3:42 am
Regina (Quila) v Secretary of State for the Home Department Queen’s Bench Division “Age discrimination against immigrant spouses aged under 21 was justified. [read post]
25 Feb 2008, 2:30 pm
United States v. [read post]
19 Apr 2017, 9:23 pm
Novartis AG), in which the PTAB stated in an institution decision that a particular prior art's "stated reasons for using mannitol in liquid pharmaceutical compositions are inapplicable to... [read post]
20 Nov 2011, 9:02 pm
State AGs, of course, win the freedom to file and stay in the state court of their choice. [read post]
18 Feb 2009, 2:22 am
Chandler v Camden London Borough Council; Chandler v Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families [2009] EWHC 219 (Admin); [2009] WLR (D) 58 “A parent of school age children could not be classed as an ‘economic operator’ and did not therefore have sufficient standing under European and domestic rules on public procurement to bring a [...] [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 10:00 pm
On Septemeber 30, 2011, a United States District Court in New York granted Diamler AG, Mercedes-AMG GmbH, and Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC’s, motion for summary judgment in an action brought by Plaintiff to recover for injuries incurred in an accident that allegedly occurred because of multiple defects in the vehicle. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 10:52 am
Haribo Lakritzen Hans Riegel Betriebs GmbH v Finanzamt Linz; Osterreichische Salinen AG v Same(Joined Cases C-436/08 and C-437/08); ; [2011] WLR (D) 49 “Legislation of a member state which discriminated against portfolio dividends received by a resident company from a company resident in a non member state party to an EEA Agreement, was contrary to the principle of free movement of capital, where that discrimination was based upon a comprehensive… [read post]
