Search for: "State v. Aircraft Supplies, Inc."
Results 1 - 20
of 51
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Sep 2023, 1:54 pm
In Hydraulics International, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 5:47 am
From Gregory v. [read post]
1 Jun 2023, 6:41 pm
” Armadillo Distribution Enterprises, Inc. v. [read post]
24 May 2023, 3:55 pm
For example, it is inappropriate to ignore negotiated reductions to the final price.[25] But the contractor must establish that the negotiated reduction related to the same cost element as the undisclosed data.[26] The proposed price also is not the appropriate baseline where there have been material changes, such as new quantities or delivery schedules.[27] Additionally, the proposal price is not the appropriate baseline where there is evidence the Government relied on another analysis or… [read post]
3 May 2022, 4:18 am
Russia has struck a military airfield near Ukraine’s southwestern city of Odesa, destroying drones, missiles and ammunition supplied to Ukraine by the U.S. and its European allies, Russia’s defense ministry said today. [read post]
9 Jun 2021, 8:28 am
In its most recent manifestations one sees the imposition of public pressure on the National Basketball Association and on Apple Inc. respecting their entanglement in Xinjiang that increasingly serves as the defining point for the difference between US and Chinese normative approaches to public governance; here and here). [read post]
9 Apr 2021, 12:48 pm
Islam v. [read post]
16 Jan 2021, 10:57 pm
Part II examines supply chain’s use of letters of intent. [read post]
14 Jan 2021, 7:25 am
In Davis-Lynch Holding Co., Inc. v. [read post]
18 Aug 2020, 7:53 am
The court rejected this argument, relying on a Fourth Circuit case, Universal Furniture International, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Aug 2020, 7:02 am
Although the skilled person may already have such an understanding, it was more likely that he would acquire that knowledge when he was asked to involve himself in design an aircraft power supply. [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 6:58 am
” That royalty is no pittance: In Hughes Aircraft v. [read post]
18 Mar 2020, 2:00 pm
Aug. 12, 1998) (“direct physical loss” was ambiguous; thus carbon monoxide exposure would come under that definition); Columbiaknit, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Jul 2018, 5:00 pm
., ANA Aircraft Technics, Co., Ltd., ANA Base Maintenance Technics, Co., Ltd., ANA Holdings, Inc., and All Nippon Airways Co., Ltd. [read post]
10 Apr 2017, 1:40 pm
GAO cited Hughes Aircraft Co. v. [read post]
30 Dec 2016, 1:27 pm
Farm Bureau Fed'n v. [read post]
30 Dec 2016, 1:27 pm
Farm Bureau Fed'n v. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 11:57 am
Defendants had no in-state offices, real estate, were not registered to do business, had no address, phone numbers, bank accounts, or employees.Google Inc. v. [read post]
19 Nov 2014, 12:07 pm
In Danella Southwest, Inc. v. [read post]
16 May 2014, 6:22 pm
The “main carrier” is the primary (long-haul) carrier of the goods to the destination, usually an ocean going vessel or aircraft. [read post]
