Search for: "State v. Alcorn" Results 1 - 20 of 22
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Dec 2014, 12:35 am by Jon Gelman
Flanking them were James Sherk, also of the Heritage Foundation, and William Messenger, the attorney from the National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation who argued Harris v. [read post]
17 Sep 2009, 3:22 am
The Court stated that neither Gerdes nor Alcorn controlled in the instant case. [read post]
27 Jul 2009, 10:45 am
(...)In Aristocrat Technologies Australia Pty Ltd. v. [read post]
18 Apr 2017, 4:31 pm by Will Baude
 (Jonathan Alcorn/Bloomberg) Next week the Supreme Court will hear oral argument in BNSF Railway v. [read post]
22 May 2015, 4:00 am by INFORRM
The defendant relied on the judgment of Lord Dyson in the Supreme Court case of R (Lumba) v Secretary of State for the Home Department ([2012] 1 AC 245 [101]), in which he disapproved the concept of “vindicatory damages”. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 4:31 pm by INFORRM
(d)        The judge was wrong to reject MGN’s submission that damages for breach of privacy are compensation for injured feelings and are not intended to mark wrongdoing, such damages being vindicatory in effect and therefore contrary to the principles stated inLumba v Secretary of State for the Home Department. [read post]
3 Feb 2009, 12:40 am
To recover for intentional infliction of emotional distress, the employer's action must be shown to be "so extreme and outrageous as to go beyond all bounds of decency, and to be regarded as atrocious, and utterly intolerable in a civilized community" as California Supreme Court noted in Alcorn v. [read post]