Search for: "State v. Almond" Results 1 - 20 of 78
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Aug 2010, 8:47 am
On August 3, 2010, the US Court of Appeals for the DC Circuit ruled that California organic almond growers can challenge federal requirements that almonds be pasteurized or chemically treated in Koretoff et al. v. [read post]
31 May 2022, 1:14 pm
The California statute says that the state is allowed to list as endangered any "native species or subspecies of a bird, mammal, fish, amphibian, reptile, or plant. [read post]
4 Dec 2007, 9:55 am
I do think that Hershey has stated a pretty good case for a parody but that is not quite what they wanted to do here. [read post]
24 Sep 2018, 8:19 pm by Georgina Hey (AU)
The Board also seems to ascribe to the average Australian consumer the basic level of intelligence required to recognise that a product labelled “almond milk” is made with (non-lactating) almonds, a level of confidence that apparently the FDA and the ECJ do not share! [read post]
24 Sep 2018, 8:19 pm by Georgina Hey (AU)
The Board also seems to ascribe to the average Australian consumer the basic level of intelligence required to recognise that a product labelled “almond milk” is made with (non-lactating) almonds, a level of confidence that apparently the FDA and the ECJ do not share! [read post]
By Kerry Shapiro and Daniel Quinley The last month has seen a flurry of activity related to the California and Federal Endangered Species Acts, including: The California Supreme Court’s denial of review in the Almond Alliance of California v. [read post]