Search for: "State v. Amato"
Results 61 - 77
of 77
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Feb 2010, 2:20 pm
Opinion below (6th Circuit) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Title: Amato v. [read post]
27 Oct 2008, 3:49 pm
Pruitt, No. 06-6002 Given the particular characteristics of North Carolina sentencing law, in light of recent United States Supreme Court precedent, in determining whether to apply the career offender provision of the United States Sentencing Guidelines, a federal court must take into account the defendant's state criminal history (or lack thereof) at the time of his predicate North Carolina convictions. [read post]
7 Oct 2008, 4:03 am
In United States v. [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 2:15 pm
Amato , No. 06-5600, 06-5741, 07-2152, 07-2311 Convictions and sentences for series of frauds against several states and a corporation are affirmed over claims that the district court erred by: 1) refusing to grant a new trial based on the government's alleged withholding of impeachment material and newly discovered exculpatory evidence; 2) refusing to sever defendants' trials; 3) improperly instructing the jury as to the meaning of "false statements" and… [read post]
27 Aug 2008, 3:43 am
The multi-million dollar legal and forensic accounting fees incurred by companies investigating fraud perpetrated by their executives may be included in a restitution order under the Mandatory Victims Restitution Act (MVRA), the Second Circuit held in United States v. [read post]
24 Aug 2008, 6:07 pm
United States v. [read post]
21 Aug 2008, 4:06 pm
Today in US v. [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 10:23 am
Amato v. [read post]
4 Jun 2008, 3:28 am
BAC level), whereas HGN does not. 16 A very recent investigation17 found that only HGN was effective at distinguishing persons above or below a BAC of .04%, a standard sometimes applied to drivers of commercial vehicles and, in some states, to drivers younger than 21. [read post]
10 Sep 2007, 10:39 am
Public Service Commission of West Virginia, 57 F.3d 385, 389-90 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 974 (1995) (in Contract Clause case, "whether the cities have standing to bring this suit is unclear"); Amato v. [read post]
23 Aug 2007, 8:06 am
Law Div. 1994); Amato v. [read post]
22 May 2007, 1:09 am
Joseph Amato U.S. [read post]
2 Apr 2007, 5:54 am
Audi AG v. [read post]
28 Mar 2007, 9:24 am
United States v. [read post]
27 Dec 2006, 12:39 am
Amato NASSAU COUNTYLand Use and PlanningCourt Finds Claim for Unconstitutionally Vague Ordinance Is Stated by Vendor Party Magic Enterprises Inc. v. [read post]
7 Aug 2006, 5:22 am
Cir. 1999); Amato v. [read post]
7 Aug 2006, 5:22 am
Cir. 1999); Amato v. [read post]
