Search for: "State v. Andries"
Results 1 - 14
of 14
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Apr 2012, 12:52 pm
The plaintiff in Andrie, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Jul 2014, 7:33 am
Andris (Summer Associate) (jandris@hillwallack.com ) In a decision that has sparked interest from the beaches of Malibu to the beaches of Sea Isle, a Los Angeles County, California Superior Court ruled that three teacher employment laws – California’s Permanent Employment, Dismissal, and LIFO (last in, first out) Statutes – were unconstitutional.*[1] Decided on June 10, 2014, the case, Vergara v. [read post]
2 Jan 2013, 3:10 pm
United States of America v. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 12:12 am
The January 2024 high court judgment in Cash Crusaders Franchising (Pty) Ltd v Cash Crusaders Franchisees Listed on Annexure ‘ADP1’ to the Founding Affidavit of Andries Daniel Du Plooy (16453/2023) [2024] ZAWCHC 11 related to a dispute between Cash Crusaders Franchising (Pty) Ltd and franchisees arising from a systemic change by Cash Crusaders of the rules pertaining to pawn transactions. [read post]
26 Dec 2023, 4:22 am
Andris v 1376 Forest Realty, LLC Section 702 of the LLC Law expressly confers standing to seek judicial dissolution on members. [read post]
14 Sep 2010, 9:30 am
Andries v. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 4:12 am
” You can read here Peter Sluka’s analysis of the Andris decision. [read post]
5 Dec 2018, 11:18 am
On October 31, the FTC filed its complaint against Andris Pukke, the creator of the scam, and numerous other defendants. [read post]
29 Nov 2017, 4:30 am
Dixon and the Cowan v. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 11:34 am
Andries v. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 6:02 am
We, of course think that's wrong under Erie - where the default should be, if a form of liability hasn't been recognized by a state court, then it should be dismissed by a federal court applying that state's law in a diversity action.ConnecticutIn Gerrity v. [read post]
23 Sep 2014, 4:38 am
BootsDeckers Outdoor Corporation v J.C. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 4:34 am
According to the Second Department, therefore, Section 608 gives the estate of a deceased member standing to pursue a dissolution claim, despite the language in Section 702 stating that only a member can petition for dissolution. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 11:19 am
(Sierra Club, Inc. v. [read post]
