Search for: "State v. Apana"
Results 1 - 3
of 3
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jul 2009, 9:04 am
The Mainland States are split about whether the 'pollution exclusion' in most insurance policies (including this one) covers only traditional environmental pollution or stuff like this, and your Awesome State hasn't yet answered this question. [read post]
22 Jul 2009, 8:03 am
Allegations that a store employee suffered injuries as a result of inhaling noxious fumes from a drain cleaner being applied by the insured plumber were held subject to a total pollution exclusion in Apana v. [read post]
