Search for: "State v. Apo" Results 1 - 20 of 46
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Oct 2012, 8:27 am by Wayne J. D'Angelo
Jim Keffer, the Texas state legislator who proposed and passed the first fracking disclosure law, and Richard Ranger, Senior Policy Advisor at the American Petroleum Institute (API). [read post]
17 Aug 2016, 5:00 pm by John Collins
  The Court found that to be patentable the invention must involve the creation of an artificial state of affairs where the computer is integral to the invention, rather than a mere tool in which the invention is performed. [read post]
13 Aug 2017, 12:54 am by Mark Summerfield
  In Rokt Pte Ltd [2017] APO 34 claims directed to a computer implemented method for linking a computer user to an advertising message by way of an intermediate engagement offer were refused, following the applicant’s efforts to amend in view of an earlier decision in Rokt Pte Ltd [2016] APO 66. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 4:34 pm by war
The product literature also statedApo-Leflunomide is not indicated for the treatment of psoriasis that is not associated with manifestations of arthritic disease. [read post]
23 Jan 2016, 11:42 pm by Mark Summerfield
Back in November 2015, the Australian Patent Office issued the first published decision to consider enhanced requirements for patent specifications that were introduced by the Intellectual Property Laws Amendment (Raising the Bar) Act 2012: CSR Building Products Limited v United States Gypsum Company [2015] APO 72.The decision arises from an opposition by CSR Building Products Limited to the grant of a patent on an application by United States Gypsum Company. [read post]
19 Nov 2017, 4:36 am by Mark Summerfield
  This change from the old ‘fair basis’ provision was intended to align Australian patent law with that of the UK and Europe, requiring the disclosure to be commensurate with the scope of the claims, i.e. that the description should be sufficient to enable the skilled person to perform the invention across the full width of the claims.So far, there has been no judicial consideration of this new enablement requirement, and until recently there was just one Patent Office decision, CSR… [read post]
18 Dec 2018, 1:45 pm by Mark Summerfield
  Traditionally, therefore, it has not relied upon an extensive factual background, and particularly not upon evidence as to the state of the prior art, which is more properly the province of enquiries into whether an invention is novel and/or involves an inventive step. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 2:45 pm by Unknown
Chase Blog, Sept. 2019) [text]ICE Continues to Manipulate the Appropriations Process to Increase the Mass Incarceration of Immigrants (Immigration Impact Blog, Aug. 2019) [text]Reports & journal articles:The Detention Drain: How Immigration Detention Hurts New Mexico’s Economy (Institute for Policy Studies, Aug. 2019) [text via APO]How to Divest from Immigrant Detention: A Philanthropic Primer (Grantmakers Concerned with Immigrants and Refugees, Aug. 2019) [text]How… [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 6:32 pm by Stephen Albainy-Jenei
What is perhaps less well known is that the APO is quietly moving to issue rejections based on the “obvious to try” standard. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 10:12 am by Jonathan Bailey
The deadline for the paperwork was coming up soon but the actual hearing itself won’t be until August.2: US High Court Won't Hear Copyright Suit Against Google On Nude PhotosNext up today, the Perfect 10 v. [read post]