Search for: "State v. Apodaca"
Results 81 - 96
of 96
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Dec 2020, 2:50 pm
The first, he explained, is based on the idea that the Supreme Court’s 1972 decision in Apodaca v. [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 6:57 pm
” United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2007, 9:05 pm
S. 223 (1978) (prohibiting five person state juries but allowing juries of six), and unanimity, see Apodaca v. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 7:09 am
Apodaca, 726 P.2d 565 (Ariz. 1986), did “not believe that the concept of punitive damages should be stretched. [read post]
18 Jul 2013, 9:01 pm
The Court then further eroded the traditional adherence to unanimous, twelve-person juries in its 1972 decisions in Apodaca v. [read post]
16 Apr 2011, 12:43 pm
United States v. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 2:48 pm
In Apodaca v. [read post]
27 Sep 2022, 8:42 am
Apodaca, 151 Ariz. 149 (1986), and Linthicum v. [read post]
27 Sep 2022, 8:42 am
Apodaca, 151 Ariz. 149 (1986), and Linthicum v. [read post]
26 Mar 2019, 10:12 am
1970s Supreme Court Ruled Non-Unanimous Guilty Verdicts Permissible In sharply divided opinions (4-1-4) in Apodaca v. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 9:01 pm
As the Court had already, in Apodaca v. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 7:18 am
The petitions in the cases seek to have the Court reconsider its splintered decision in 1972 in Apodaca v. [read post]
24 Oct 2007, 10:51 am
Would you state your name for the record. [read post]
29 May 2011, 1:30 pm
United States v. [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 5:45 pm
Dow, 176 U.S. 581 (1900) with Apodaca v. [read post]
16 Jan 2020, 5:03 am
From Apodaca-Fisk v. [read post]
