Search for: "State v. Apt" Results 121 - 140 of 880
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Apr 2023, 5:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
  Matter of Town of Hempstead v New York State Div. of Human Rights 2023 NY Slip Op 02129 Decided on April 26, 2023 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. [read post]
29 Apr 2023, 5:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
  Matter of Town of Hempstead v New York State Div. of Human Rights 2023 NY Slip Op 02129 Decided on April 26, 2023 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. [read post]
21 May 2012, 7:50 am by Rosalind English
They based their claim on Article 3 but relied by analogy on the high duty to investigate that arose under article 2 of the ECHR when a suicide had occurred as illustrated in R(Amin) v Secretary of State for the Home Office [2003] and in R (L (A Patient)) v Secretary of State for Justice [2009] AC 588. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 9:19 am
Weideman Today the United States Supreme Court handed down its decision in Dukes v. [read post]
17 Nov 2020, 7:40 pm by Linda McClain
Supreme Court in Fulton, Velte suggests that how some Justices view the aptness of the race discrimination/sexual orientation analogy may shape their approach to the case. [read post]
9 Nov 2012, 5:31 am by Susan Brenner
Then, Castillo traveled to 3073 Park Avenue, Apt. [read post]
22 Aug 2008, 12:59 pm
The notion of technological mediation is particularly apt, as is its implications for design ethics. [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 10:00 am by Dan Ernst
Many historians and political scientists have concluded courts are more apt to follow rather than lead public opinion to the detriment of minority interests.This question of judicial capacity and social change has returned with great intensity as courts have systematically dismantled state laws prohibiting same-sex marriage. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 12:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The court opined that "It is hornbook law that one who objects to the act of an administrative agency must exhaust available administrative remedies before being permitted to litigate [its  objection] in a court of law," citing Watergate II Apts. v Buffalo Sewer Auth., 46 NY2d 52.* Addressing Facility's contention that it had raised a constitutional challenge alleging that OMIG exceeded its authority and violated Article III, §1, of the New York… [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The court opined that "It is hornbook law that one who objects to the act of an administrative agency must exhaust available administrative remedies before being permitted to litigate [its  objection] in a court of law," citing Watergate II Apts. v Buffalo Sewer Auth., 46 NY2d 52.* Addressing Facility's contention that it had raised a constitutional challenge alleging that OMIG exceeded its authority and violated Article III, §1, of the New York… [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 10:17 am by Hannah Buxbaum
  Or perhaps the more apt expression would be, another goose to cook -- the goose, of course, being the implied right of action under 10(b) and Rule 10b-5. [read post]