Search for: "State v. Apt"
Results 141 - 160
of 880
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jun 2015, 8:10 pm
Supreme Court engaged deeply in Zivotofsky v. [read post]
25 Nov 2008, 1:17 pm
United States v. [read post]
11 Jun 2018, 4:30 am
” In U.S. v. [read post]
24 Sep 2018, 4:34 pm
Srinivasan challenges Phillips’ third contention, suggesting that United States v. [read post]
14 Nov 2006, 5:32 am
Non-citizens living in the United States are certainly not held in slavery, but Taney's infamous phrase is still eerily apt: Because of the Military Commissions Act of 2006, the U.S. government can snatch any non-citizen living in the United States at any time, anywhere, and hold them indefinitely without the right of habeas corpus and without any of the criminal procedure protections afforded by the Bill of Rights. [read post]
27 Jun 2015, 2:50 pm
Would that be reviewable by a court, given that it involves a question of the validity to state law? [read post]
30 Oct 2015, 7:05 am
United States and United States v. [read post]
5 Apr 2021, 6:30 am
Democracies are increasingly recognising that that should mean something.Exercise of foreign policy, where other states are especially in need of assurances that a particular commitment is being undertaken by the state and not just its government of the day, is particularly apt for accommodating the democratic runner-up. [read post]
Balancing freedom of expression against the right to private life - Kurier Zeitungsverlag v. Austria
24 Jun 2012, 1:37 am
In Kurier Zeitungsverlag und Druckerei GmbH v. [read post]
18 Sep 2009, 4:00 am
Manhattan Apts., Inc., No. 07-4074 (2nd Cir. [read post]
4 Feb 2020, 12:41 pm
We should respond that these questions address the ability of a potential juror to be fair and impartial, an area of inquiry in which a trial court is more apt to commit error (see CPL § 270.20[1][b]; People v Arnold, 96 NY2d 358 [2001]; People v Johnson, 94 NY2d 600 [2000]; People v Lewis, 71 AD3d 1582 [4th Dept 2010]; People v Habte, 35 AD3d 1199 [4th Dept 2006]). [read post]
13 Feb 2017, 1:18 pm
It is remarkable that a basic recitation of Washington v. [read post]
1 Nov 2007, 1:32 pm
The Supreme Court briefing is now complete in Riegel v. [read post]
25 Oct 2022, 10:46 am
Brief of the United States as Amicus Curiae, New York v. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 12:17 pm
From United States v. [read post]
3 Apr 2009, 7:30 am
The death and personal injury case is Hancock-Underwood v. [read post]
26 May 2022, 2:16 pm
Again, the medical analogy is apt. [read post]
6 Oct 2018, 11:28 am
As a matter of principle, Part I could be excluded if, on facts, the juridical seat is outside India or the law governing the arbitration agreement is a law other than Indian law , as was held in Union of India v. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 11:50 am
An interesting part of Michigan v. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 6:23 am
Justice Kennedy’s admonition in Lawrence v. [read post]
