Search for: "State v. Arthur C. List"
Results 1 - 20
of 145
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Apr 2021, 5:55 am
In Woods v. [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 6:51 am
Collectively:Class C misdemeanors accounted for 61,825 jail bed days.Class B misdemeanors accounted for 316,639 jail bed daysClass A misdemeanors accounted for 480,495 jail bed days.Jefferson County (Beaumont/Port Arthur) was by far the worst jurisdiction in the Apppleseed analysis when it came to Class C incarceration: 42% of all misdemeanor-bed days in the county jail were accounted for by Class-C defendants. [read post]
18 May 2019, 9:27 am
Rather, he stated that the factors relevant to his attorney's fees were (1) the amount in controversy, (2) the complexity of the case, and (3) his knowledge and experience—three of the eight factors set out in Arthur Andersen & Co. v. [read post]
2 Jan 2013, 3:17 pm
Defendant: Joseph C. [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 12:46 pm
Arthur R. [read post]
7 Jul 2009, 12:53 am
Bennett, a partner at Jones Day, discuss Arthur Andersen LLP v. [read post]
One of the Stiffest Charges Against Jan. 6 Insurrectionists Hangs on by a Thread in the D.C. Circuit
11 Apr 2023, 5:01 am
United States: “a crime that is similar to the listed examples in some respects but different in others. [read post]
22 Jan 2007, 9:53 am
Hammond, Monique Bradley Lampke, Porter Wright Morris & Arthur, Columbus, OH, for Plaintiffs. [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 5:40 am
Edwards on behalf of the late Arthur Watkins v Hugh James Ford Simey Solicitors, heard 25 Jul 2019. [read post]
5 Sep 2009, 8:00 am
Weil V. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 10:38 pm
During the 2009 copyright consultation, many stakeholders called for the implementation of the "such as" approach, which would have made the list of categories illustrative rather than exhaustive. [read post]
18 Nov 2019, 2:41 am
Edwards on behalf of the late Arthur Watkins v Hugh James Ford Simey Solicitors, heard 25 Jul 2019. [read post]
29 Jul 2019, 1:00 am
Edwards on behalf of the late Arthur Watkins v Hugh James Ford Simey Solicitors, heard 25 Jul 2019. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 6:49 am
Edwards on behalf of the late Arthur Watkins v Hugh James Ford Simey Solicitors, heard 25 Jul 2019. [read post]
27 Dec 2022, 5:52 am
As such, the out-of-state Plaintiffs did not have standing to bring CCPA claims against Retail Defendants. * In re Arthur J. [read post]
24 Jun 2009, 1:15 pm
So, what exactly is the state-of-mind requirement of 2778(c)? [read post]
28 Oct 2019, 3:43 am
Edwards on behalf of the late Arthur Watkins v Hugh James Ford Simey Solicitors, heard 25 Jul 2019. [read post]
14 Oct 2019, 2:27 am
Patel v Secretary of State for the Home Department; Secretary of State for the Home Department v Shah, heard 7 May 2019. [read post]
21 Oct 2019, 3:26 am
Patel v Secretary of State for the Home Department; Secretary of State for the Home Department v Shah, heard 7 May 2019. [read post]
15 Dec 2009, 5:19 am
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. [read post]
