Search for: "State v. Ashness" Results 41 - 60 of 516
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jul 2022, 8:55 am by Lawrence Solum
  Here is the abstract: On June 24th 2022 the United States Supreme Court decided Dobbs v. [read post]
5 Jul 2022, 3:28 am by Peter Mahler
Further, as noted in Royal Communications Consultants Inc. v. [read post]
The rate of pay required for non-exempt employees is the regular rate during the pay period the leave is taken if the employer uses the workweek method, or alternatively the employer can use a 90-day lookback for determining the average regular rate, that is generally the same as with the normal state paid sick leave law (unless the employer has any flat-sum bonuses involved, in which case the employer will need to use the Alvarado-method of calculating the regular rate, as detailed here). [read post]
30 May 2022, 1:00 am by David Pocklington
The Chancellor stated that only because the font is chipped, it may be removed and destroyed. [read post]
20 May 2022, 9:30 am by Elizabeth Whatcott
Table of Contents Part I Whether to Call Russian Actions in Ukraine “Genocide” – Alphabetically by State/Organization Part II Whether to Call Russian Actions in Ukraine “Genocide” – Chronologically Part I Whether to Call Russian Actions in Ukraine “Genocide” – Alphabetically by State/Organization Albania March 29: Albanian representative Ferit Hoxha notes in the Security Council that the siege on Mariupol seems designed to… [read post]
10 Apr 2022, 9:08 pm by Daniel E. Walters
The Court’s decision in the latest of these cases, West Virginia v. [read post]
24 Dec 2021, 12:30 pm by John Ross
" Dissent: Whatever the Fifth said, there's two meanings of "necessary," and this ain't the one from McCulloch v. [read post]
3 Dec 2021, 12:19 am by INFORRM
In reaching this conclusion, the Senior Master referred to: Campbell v MGN Ltd [2004] UKHL 22 at [132]; McKennitt v Ash [2008] QB 73 per Buxton LJ at [8]; Wainwright v The Home Office [2004] 2 AC 406 at [18]-[19] and [23], [43] and [62]  Perhaps unsurprisingly, the notion of a tort of physical intrusion privacy were given short shrift. [read post]
17 Nov 2021, 9:43 am by Christopher Prudhomme
However, Judge Ashe did not dismiss the allegations of res ipsa loquitur and respondeat superior, stating that these are not independent causes of action; but instead, they are legal theories in support of negligence. [read post]
19 Sep 2021, 9:22 am by Howard Friedman
  The complaint (full text) in Californians for Equal Rights Foundation v. [read post]
12 Sep 2021, 4:32 pm by INFORRM
On 25 August 2019, as wickets fell around him, Ben Stokes produced a stunning, unrivalled display at the Headingley crease to earn England an unexpected (and, certainly, undeserved) victory in the third test of the Ashes series. [read post]
25 Aug 2021, 9:03 pm by Aaron Kaufman
Supreme Court decision in Murphy v. [read post]
8 Jul 2021, 7:11 pm by Vercammen Law
When discovery ended in early January 2020, Care One moved for summary judgment, seeking a determination that plaintiff could not assert a claim based on Care One's breach of any state or federal statutes or regulations. [read post]