Search for: "State v. Bagley"
Results 61 - 80
of 226
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Mar 2015, 7:23 pm
On Halbig and statutory interpretation (with a reply to Professor Bagley) – a discussion of the Halbig decision and its significance Why the DC Circuit’s interpretation of the ACA in Halbig v. [read post]
3 Sep 2021, 9:30 pm
In the Atlantic, Mary Ziegler (Florida State University), "The Justices Are Telling Us What They Think About Roe v. [read post]
6 Jan 2016, 5:58 am
” At Notice and Comment, Nicholas Bagley looks back at last month’s oral argument in Gobeille v. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 7:14 pm
In 1985, the Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
14 Apr 2015, 4:04 am
” In The Incidental Economist, Nicholas Bagley considers whether, if the Court rules for the plaintiffs in King v. [read post]
1 Apr 2019, 7:12 pm
Fund v. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 2:20 pm
United States? [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 7:56 am
" The canon in question was applied by the Chief Justice, on behalf of six Justices, in last year's Bond decision--namely, the “the well-established principle” of Gregory v. [read post]
6 May 2019, 12:05 pm
United States, 18-6859, and Santos v. [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 7:29 am
One set of cases, including Halbig v. [read post]
8 May 2013, 9:44 am
Bagley, Esq., a Member in McNees Wallace & Nurick LLC's Labor and Employment Practice Group. [read post]
8 Oct 2009, 5:11 am
” Irish v. [read post]
3 May 2018, 11:23 am
United States, 405 U.S. 150, 153–55, 92 S.Ct. 763, 31 L.Ed.2d 104 (1972); Bagley, 473 U.S. at 676. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 7:17 am
In Sierra Club v. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 3:30 am
Briefly: At The Incidental Economist, Nicholas Bagley discusses the Court’s recent opinion in Armstrong v. [read post]
20 Jun 2016, 3:12 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 3:59 pm
Halbig v. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 2:45 am
United States, in which the Court will consider two issues relating to federal computer crimes, for this blog; I did the same for Green v. [read post]
10 Nov 2020, 6:35 am
In California v. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 9:00 pm
’” Id. at 280 (quoting Bagley, 473 U.S. at 682). [read post]
