Search for: "State v. Bain" Results 121 - 140 of 218
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Oct 2013, 3:24 am
The Société Anonyme Des Bains De Mer Et Du Cercle Des Étrangers À Monaco (mercifully abbreviated by the judge to 'SBM') owned the Casino de Monte-Carlo and enjoyed the state monopoly in relation to the provision of casino gaming services in Monaco. [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 5:48 am by Kelly Phillips Erb
Tax Court (Tax Court No. 015675-11 BMC Software Inc. v Commissioner of Internal Revenue). [read post]
13 Aug 2013, 3:49 pm by Mary L. Dudziak
  (Another opinion in the file is Douglas’s dissent from the dismissal of Massachusetts v. [read post]
10 Feb 2013, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
Media Law in Other Jurisdictions Hawaii: The so-called ‘Steven Tyler Act’, named after the lead singer of Aerosmith, will be considered in the state Senate Judiciary Committee. [read post]
17 Oct 2012, 2:05 pm by PunditMom
Take a look at how many were partners at  Bain Capital when he was running it. [read post]
2 Sep 2012, 5:25 am by pete.black@gmail.com (Peter Black)
Soon, legal experts say, the trend swept through state and local law-enforcement agencies across America. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 3:30 am by LindaMBeale
  Wouldn't it be prudent for the people of the United States to have the same prior to "hiring" someone to lead the country[?] [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 9:45 am by Gordon Todd
Circuit’s unanimous en banc opinion in SpeechNow.org v. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 8:02 am by Frank Pasquale
There is no dispute that Antilla included certain facts tending to support the short sellers’ story: Howard Finkelstein was a convicted felon who had, in fact, used the alias “Robert Howard,” see United States v. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 5:49 pm
I can’t keep track any more — of Bain Capital. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 8:10 am by Mandelman
Stafne and his colleagues submitted an amicus brief to the Supreme Court in Bain v MERS, which involved challenging foreclosure practices. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 5:39 am
The Supreme Court Thursday is expected to issue arguably the most anticipated decision since 2000's Bush v. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 6:14 am
v=eTnHjYOFuB4"} ) CITIZENS UNITED WON'T GET SECOND LOOK Arizona's law wasn't all the high court tackled. [read post]